From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
skomatineni@nvidia.com, luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com,
mchehab@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: media: tegra-video: add NULL checks for of_device_get_match_data()
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:07:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546FSeECSqm-ORhiEUYCVw@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260412205057.386856-1-hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
On Monday, April 13, 2026 5:50 AM Alexandru Hossu wrote:
> tegra_csi_probe(), tegra_vi_probe(), and tegra_vip_probe() all call
> of_device_get_match_data() to retrieve SoC-specific data from the device
> tree match table, but none of them check the return value for NULL before
> eventually dereferencing it.
>
> In tegra_csi_probe(), the pointer is dereferenced on the very next
> statement via csi->soc->num_clks. In tegra_vi_probe(), it is dereferenced
> later via vi->soc->ops. In tegra_vip_probe(), vip->soc is stored and then
> dereferenced at runtime via vip->soc->ops->vip_start_streaming(). A NULL
> return would cause a kernel NULL pointer dereference in each case.
>
> Add a NULL check returning -ENODEV in all three probe functions, consistent
> with the defensive pattern already used in similar staging drivers such as
> drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_hw.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/csi.c | 2 ++
> drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vi.c | 2 ++
> drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vip.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/csi.c b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/csi.c
> index 7842104ca933..33369a8c803a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/csi.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/csi.c
> @@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ static int tegra_csi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(csi->iomem);
>
> csi->soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!csi->soc)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> csi->clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, csi->soc->num_clks,
> sizeof(*csi->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vi.c b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vi.c
> index d1d934e361f7..f3b749f059f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vi.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vi.c
> @@ -1907,6 +1907,8 @@ static int tegra_vi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(vi->iomem);
>
> vi->soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!vi->soc)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> vi->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(vi->clk)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vip.c b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vip.c
> index 80cd3b113125..148c68ceb605 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vip.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/vip.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ static int tegra_vip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> vip->soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!vip->soc)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> vip->dev = &pdev->dev;
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vip);
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
These devices are only probed through device tree, so we know the
returned pointer is always non-NULL. Typically we don't check in such
cases.
Thanks
Mikko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-12 20:50 [PATCH 1/5] staging: media: tegra-video: add NULL checks for of_device_get_match_data() Alexandru Hossu
2026-04-13 3:07 ` Mikko Perttunen [this message]
2026-04-13 5:21 ` Alexandru Hossu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546FSeECSqm-ORhiEUYCVw@nvidia.com \
--to=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hossu.alexandru@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=skomatineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox