From: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Moritz C. Weber" <mo.c.weber@gmail.com>,
marvin24@gmx.de, ac100@lists.launchpad.net,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: nvec: nvec: fixed two usleep_range is preferred over udelay warnings
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:42:57 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569e7346-1063-3ef9-8bd0-3094fe200074@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212152110.4f8fe0e6@namcao>
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Nam Cao wrote:
> On 12/Feb/2024 Moritz C. Weber wrote:
>> Fixed a code style issue raised by checkpatch.
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>> index 2823cacde..18c5471d5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>> break;
>> case 2: /* first byte after command */
>> if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
>> - udelay(33);
>> + usleep_range(32, 33);
>> if (nvec->rx->data[0] != 0x01) {
>> dev_err(nvec->dev,
>> "Read without prior read command\n");
>> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>> * We experience less incomplete messages with this delay than without
>> * it, but we don't know why. Help is appreciated.
>> */
>> - udelay(100);
>> + usleep_range(99, 100);
>>
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>
> I have zero knowledge about this driver, but nvec_interrupt() seems to be
> a hard interrupt handler, and sleeping in an interrupt handler is a big no
> no. So I think this change breaks the driver.
>
> Delaying like the driver is currently doing doesn't break things, but it is
> not very nice because this is interrupt handler and the processor cannot
> switch to other tasks, so delaying is wasting processor's cycles here. The
> better fix would be to figure out how to remove the delay entirely, or
> switch to threaded interrupt handler and then we can use usleep_range() in
> there, but you need actual hardware to test such changes.
the real fix to read back the value we wrote to the controller, similar to
what is done for the tegra i2c host, which is a trival fix.
Unfortunately, this breaks the touch pad initialisation, which needs to be
fixed first. As this topic comes up every year, I'm going to post a patch
in order to updated the comment, so this kind of patches should
(hopefully) stop in the future.
Best regrards,
Marc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-18 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-12 13:36 [PATCH] Staging: nvec: nvec: fixed two usleep_range is preferred over udelay warnings Moritz C. Weber
2024-02-12 13:55 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-02-12 14:21 ` Nam Cao
2024-02-16 11:53 ` Thierry Reding
2024-02-18 17:42 ` Marc Dietrich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569e7346-1063-3ef9-8bd0-3094fe200074@gmx.de \
--to=marvin24@gmx.de \
--cc=ac100@lists.launchpad.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mo.c.weber@gmail.com \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox