* Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: Fix string form declaration
2022-09-09 18:24 [PATCH] staging: pi433: Fix string form declaration Burak Ozdemir
@ 2022-09-09 18:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <CACAQkfXH4smoY2v28DOZ_0uf_2=e8iEDSFbEbTMhU0JPuteOPw@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-09-09 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burak Ozdemir; +Cc: linux-staging, linux-kernel
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 06:24:13PM +0000, Burak Ozdemir wrote:
> From: Burak Ozdemir <bozdemir@gmail.com>
>
> Use correct string form declaration, prevent extra variable
> declaration in final assembly output.
I am sorry, but I do not understand this text. How is the original code
incorrect?
Please explain this a lot better when you resend a v2.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] staging: pi433: Fix string form declaration
@ 2022-09-09 18:24 Burak Ozdemir
2022-09-09 18:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Burak Ozdemir @ 2022-09-09 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: linux-staging, linux-kernel
From: Burak Ozdemir <bozdemir@gmail.com>
Use correct string form declaration, prevent extra variable
declaration in final assembly output.
Signed-off-by: Burak Ozdemir <bozdemir@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
index df02335fdbab..70b3709acbb2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int pi433_debugfs_regs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
struct pi433_device *dev;
u8 reg_data[114];
int i;
- char *fmt = "0x%02x, 0x%02x\n";
+ static const char fmt[] = "0x%02x, 0x%02x\n";
int ret;
dev = m->private;
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: Fix string form declaration
[not found] ` <CACAQkfXH4smoY2v28DOZ_0uf_2=e8iEDSFbEbTMhU0JPuteOPw@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2022-09-10 5:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-09-10 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burak Ozdemir; +Cc: linux-staging, linux-kernel
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:50:57PM +0000, Burak Ozdemir wrote:
> I have been analyzing todo tasks from `Kernel Janitors Projects` and saw
> the following task
>
> From: Jeff Garzik
>
> 1) The string form
> [const] char *foo = "blah";
> creates two variables in the final assembly output, a static string, and a
> char pointer to the static string. The alternate string form
> [const] char foo[] = "blah";
> is better because it declares a single variable.
>
> That's why I changed that char * to static const[].
I'm sorry, but I have no context here at all for what this is in
response to.
Remember, some of us get hundreds of changes each day to review, and we
have the short-term memory of a squirrel. Always include proper context
in an email message so that we know what is going on.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-10 5:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-09 18:24 [PATCH] staging: pi433: Fix string form declaration Burak Ozdemir
2022-09-09 18:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <CACAQkfXH4smoY2v28DOZ_0uf_2=e8iEDSFbEbTMhU0JPuteOPw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-09-10 5:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox