Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: fix open parentheses alignment

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

On 1/9/24 23:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:30:17PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
>>> index 36183f2a64c1..688c870d89bc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
>>> @@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ static void vt6655_mac_set_bb_type(void __iomem *iobase, u32 mask)
>>>   * Return Value: none
>>>   */
>>>  static void calculate_ofdmr_parameter(unsigned char rate,
>>> -				       u8 bb_type,
>>> -				       unsigned char *tx_rate,
>>> -				       unsigned char *rsv_time)
>>> +				      u8 bb_type,
>>> +				      unsigned char *tx_rate,
>>> +				      unsigned char *rsv_time)
>>>  {
>>>  	switch (rate) {
>>>  	case RATE_6M:
>>
>> Is there any chance that checkpatch is wrong about this warning?
>>
>> I much prefer the alignment as it was before this patch: following lines
>> are aligned with the first parameter after the '('.
>>
> 
> It just looks weird in the diff because of the + character at the front
> and how the tabs work out.  It looks ok in the code.

Oops, sorry, you are correct. Thanks!

-- 
#Randy