From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-174.mta1.migadu.com (out-174.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1708D361DB6 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 21:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773868037; cv=none; b=epVXhKGF0cQxJaCx3r6lV1XV7aG8GamRJmzs964Wm05QtxfA67zxFKhWyFgY5meWcDFdZFb0m8+RsCx2Xis78d4I0HhnGYEmwEHWElYjUNo801nQN4trYg5EJzQFbjtrKsYEsw5WXCJBmmGoSMGB5Pcw1+HCRiQm4C5FKuJ3zFA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773868037; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5blidZ38hSc2g2MnlYws3YrFYuUGtNaoZI7Bn/1vyR8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=J32UJupabvu7Fa8u/q8/oCjYPLuxEXVS3Wxqtw09I5JT7Mx6P7IJs8CiFIcJBKLwWQ/g8/BHJWP8y1MYdn1acWjDXERvhRtjNWbw9p+ifJdAwS5zH67YvbcNkOR/lrAK5UD/WCri0ppeCh7KuYn7XxtWdGNeOo+llk7R0QAT25w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=wlyp0b2/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="wlyp0b2/" Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 22:06:57 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1773868032; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AQK39Mny5kg8QapuFwlMzVzVUBSMQsg8RrV2eQHf8u8=; b=wlyp0b2/sf5pGQvAWGzaxsqOR8/Lqxcob499qZtFSQmqZBz9LHOOMIZfpRyHc3Kli6063W QEaC4lScWaeH7N8FM2Nu3g0M0S6aSxibWN5vA05+dafhiQeS3pihk1IdNHqucKNGM8jjUZ PsjCEyQKrei4nS6WUezDGAbbIaDKLiY= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Luka Gejak To: Greg KH CC: Aadarsh 7001 , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, straube.linux@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, Ethan Tidmore , luka.gejak@linux.dev Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPATCH=5D_staging=3A_rtl8723bs=3A_fixed_?= =?US-ASCII?Q?the_trailing_whitespaces/commented_code?= In-Reply-To: <2026031800-tank-shakiness-3d58@gregkh> References: <20260318021005.6346-1-aadarshmandal9354@gmail.com> <2A37C741-68A1-47E2-AB3D-833593B5C392@linux.dev> <2026031841-turban-sludge-c8c8@gregkh> <2026031814-unskilled-scrambler-3372@gregkh> <2026031800-tank-shakiness-3d58@gregkh> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On March 18, 2026 7:17:44 PM GMT+01:00, Greg KH wrote: >On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 12:54:38PM -0500, Ethan Tidmore wrote: >> On Wed Mar 18, 2026 at 10:11 AM CDT, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 08:36:21PM +0530, Aadarsh 7001 wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 5:09=E2=80=AFPM Greg KH wrote: >> >>=20 >> >> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 07:59:28AM +0100, Luka Gejak wrote: >> >> > > Hi Aadarsh, >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks for submitting this patch, and good luck with your GSoC >> >> > application! >> >> > >> >> > Wait, what? Is GSoC doing staging patches for "entrance" into the >> >> > program? If so, SOMEONE needs to tell me this, otherwise I will h= ave to >> >> > treat all of these as an abuse of the community review process and= just >> >> > flat out reject all staging patches until the GSoC application pro= cess >> >> > is over=2E >> >> > >> >> This isn't ok, you all know better than to do this=2E >> >> > >> >> > Who is in charge of the kernel GSoC project this year? >> >> > >> >> > greg k-h >> >>=20 >> >> Sorry for the confusion, that wasn't my intention to abuse the commu= nity >> >> > review process=2E This is my effort to learn and contribute to the= kernel=2E >> >> > I'll be extra care ful on this=2E Thank you for clarification=2E >> > >> > If you are applying for GSoC, this is not your fault=2E I want to kn= ow >> > who the mentors that asked you to send this patch, where is that >> > documented? >> > >> > thanks, >> > >> > greg k-h >>=20 >> It's on the actual page for it [1]: >>=20 >> Create a small patch that fixes a trivial issue in drivers/staging=2E= =20 >> See points 1) and 2) below to learn the process=2E Only after this patc= h=20 >> is accepted by the community you can go and work on the next step=2E >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> ET >>=20 >> [1] https://github=2Ecom/LinuxFoundationGSoC/ProjectIdeas/wiki/GSoC-202= 6-Device-Tree-Bindings > >And it points to a video of mine from 16 years ago > >{sigh} > >It would have been nice for someone from that project to give me the >heads-up that we would be getting a huge increase in our review load :( Hey Greg,=20 Due to an unfortunate situation of current GSoC and an increase in=20 review load, I am able to assist with patch reviews if you want=2E Best regards, Luka Gejak