From: "Ethan Tidmore" <ethantidmore06@gmail.com>
To: "Hungyu Lin" <dennylin0707@gmail.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove redundant assignments to res
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 17:35:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHKQ9PHLTODX.1QVJO6QP8YOXG@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260404100933.7911-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com>
On Sat Apr 4, 2026 at 5:09 AM CDT, Hungyu Lin wrote:
> The variable res is already equal to _FAIL when the condition
> (res == _FAIL) is true. The assignments inside the if blocks are
> redundant and can be removed.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> index 7b18be8912e6..ea1923023caa 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> @@ -209,10 +209,8 @@ s32 _rtw_init_xmit_priv(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
> pxmitbuf->buf_tag = XMITBUF_MGNT;
>
> res = rtw_os_xmit_resource_alloc(padapter, pxmitbuf, MAX_XMIT_EXTBUF_SZ + XMITBUF_ALIGN_SZ, true);
> - if (res == _FAIL) {
> - res = _FAIL;
> + if (res == _FAIL)
> goto exit;
> - }
Thanks, but it'd be much more useful if these "_SUCCESS" and "_FAIL"
macros where entirely removed instead of trying to clean up this bad
style.
Thanks,
ET
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-04 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-04 10:09 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove redundant assignments to res Hungyu Lin
2026-04-04 22:35 ` Ethan Tidmore [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHKQ9PHLTODX.1QVJO6QP8YOXG@gmail.com \
--to=ethantidmore06@gmail.com \
--cc=dennylin0707@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox