public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luka Gejak" <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: "Delene Tchio Romuald" <delenetchior1@gmail.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Ethan Tidmore" <ethantidmore06@gmail.com>,
	"Sam Daly" <sam@samdaly.ie>, <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix negative length in WEP decryption
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHTS4Y8QKDSA.28VLQAVTLYHIJ@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260405101548.124829-6-delenetchior1@gmail.com>

On Sun Apr 5, 2026 at 12:15 PM CEST, Delene Tchio Romuald wrote:
> In rtw_wep_decrypt(), length is declared as signed int and computed as:
>
>   length = len - hdrlen - iv_len;
>
> If the received frame is shorter than the combined header and IV
> lengths, length becomes negative. It is then passed to arc4_crypt()
> which takes a u32 parameter, causing the negative value to be
> implicitly cast to a very large unsigned value (e.g., -8 becomes
> 4294967288). This results in a massive out-of-bounds read and write
> on the heap via arc4_crypt(), and a similar overflow at the
> subsequent crc32_le() call using length - 4.
>
> Add a minimum frame length check before the subtraction to ensure
> length is always positive.
>
> Found by reviewing memory operations in the driver.
> Not tested on hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Delene Tchio Romuald <delenetchior1@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
>  - Rebased on staging-next
>  - Sent as numbered series with proper Cc from get_maintainer.pl
>
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> index a00504ff29109..f3bc2240749a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,12 @@ void rtw_wep_decrypt(struct adapter  *padapter, u8 *precvframe)
>  		memcpy(&wepkey[0], iv, 3);
>  		/* memcpy(&wepkey[3], &psecuritypriv->dot11DefKey[psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex].skey[0], keylength); */
>  		memcpy(&wepkey[3], &psecuritypriv->dot11DefKey[keyindex].skey[0], keylength);
> +
> +		/* Ensure the frame is long enough for WEP decryption */
> +		if (((union recv_frame *)precvframe)->u.hdr.len <=
> +		    prxattrib->hdrlen + prxattrib->iv_len)
> +			return;
> +
>  		length = ((union recv_frame *)precvframe)->u.hdr.len - prxattrib->hdrlen - prxattrib->iv_len;
>  
>  		payload = pframe + prxattrib->iv_len + prxattrib->hdrlen;

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>

Best regards,
Luka Gejak

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-15 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-05 10:15 [PATCH v3 0/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix multiple missing bounds checks Delene Tchio Romuald
2026-04-05 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix heap buffer overflow in recvframe_defrag() Delene Tchio Romuald
2026-04-15 13:56   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-15 15:24   ` Dan Carpenter
2026-04-15 16:10     ` Dan Carpenter
2026-04-05 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix integer underflow in TKIP MIC verification Delene Tchio Romuald
2026-04-15 13:56   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix out-of-bounds read in portctrl() Delene Tchio Romuald
2026-04-15 13:57   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix out-of-bounds reads in IE parsing functions Delene Tchio Romuald
2026-04-15 13:57   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-05 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix negative length in WEP decryption Delene Tchio Romuald
2026-04-15 13:57   ` Luka Gejak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DHTS4Y8QKDSA.28VLQAVTLYHIJ@linux.dev \
    --to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=delenetchior1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ethantidmore06@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sam@samdaly.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox