From: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org>
To: "Cong Nguyen" <congnt264@gmail.com>,
"Rui Miguel Silva" <rmfrfs@gmail.com>,
"Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"Alex Elder" <elder@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org>, <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: light: fix leak of cdev->name
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 11:46:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKF8YRNCVG1E.2F0JZKNLBEMHF@linaro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802060149.3803224-1-congnt264@gmail.com>
Hi Cong,
Thanks for the patch.
On Sun Aug 2, 2026 at 7:01 AM WEST, Cong Nguyen wrote:
> gb_lights_channel_config() builds the LED classdev name with kasprintf()
> and stores it in cdev->name for every channel during the configuration
> phase, which runs before the channel is registered.
>
> That name was only released by __gb_lights_led_unregister(), i.e. only for
> a normal LED channel that was actually registered. It was therefore leaked
> in two cases:
>
> - a channel that is configured but never registered, e.g.
> channel_attr_groups_set() fails, the flash configuration fails, or a
> later channel in the same light fails to configure and the whole light
> is torn down; the release path calls gb_lights_channel_unregister()
> (which returns early because the channel is not registered) and then
> gb_lights_channel_free();
>
> - a flash, torch or indicator channel, whose unregister path
> (__gb_lights_flash_led_unregister()) never releases cdev->name at all,
> so the name leaks even on a successful teardown.
>
> cdev->name is a configuration-phase allocation, like channel->color_name
> and channel->mode_name. Free it in gb_lights_channel_free() next to
> those, since that runs unconditionally on every teardown path, and drop
> the special case free from __gb_lights_led_unregister().
> gb_lights_channel_unregister() is only ever called from
> gb_lights_channel_release(), immediately followed by
> gb_lights_channel_free(), so the name is still released on the registered
> path and is freed exactly once.
>
> Commit 04820da21050 ("staging: greybus: light: Release memory obtained by
> kasprintf") fixed the leak for the registered normal-LED path only; this
> covers the remaining cases.
>
> Fixes: 2870b52bae4c ("greybus: lights: add lights implementation")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4
> Signed-off-by: Cong Nguyen <congnt264@gmail.com>
Good Catch, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org>
Cheers,
RUi
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add Assisted-by: tag to document AI assistance, per
> Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst (Greg KH).
> - No functional change.
>
> drivers/staging/greybus/light.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> index cab02b5da867..1ecca479b5f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> @@ -905,8 +905,6 @@ static void __gb_lights_led_unregister(struct gb_channel *channel)
> return;
>
> led_classdev_unregister(cdev);
> - kfree(cdev->name);
> - cdev->name = NULL;
> channel->led = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -1063,6 +1061,9 @@ static int gb_lights_light_register(struct gb_light *light)
>
> static void gb_lights_channel_free(struct gb_channel *channel)
> {
> + struct led_classdev *cdev = get_channel_cdev(channel);
> +
> + kfree(cdev->name);
> kfree(channel->attrs);
> kfree(channel->attr_group);
> kfree(channel->attr_groups);
> --
> 2.25.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 6:01 [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: light: fix leak of cdev->name Cong Nguyen
2026-08-03 10:46 ` Rui Miguel Silva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DKF8YRNCVG1E.2F0JZKNLBEMHF@linaro.com \
--to=rui.silva@linaro.org \
--cc=congnt264@gmail.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rmfrfs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox