public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@gmail.com>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue changed to inline function
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:40:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+IAZxQTkZpgD1+I@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1675753094.git.gurumeharrachaputi@gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:14:26AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> 
> This patch is to fix checkpatch warning: "Macro argument 'iobase' may be better
> as '(iobase)' to avoid precedence issues" changed to inline function. In
> relation to this, names of the callers of macro are also modified to call
> this function.
> 
> 
> Changes in v4:
> 	- Modified commit message to be clear
> 
> Changes in v3:
> 	1. Whitespace error from checkpatch fixed
> 	2. Should be applied together with changes in v2 for testing
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Macros with one statement that is to call 'iowrite8' function changed
> 	to inline function as reviewed by gregkh@linuxfoundation.org.
> 	In relation to this, names of the callers of macro are also modified
> 	to call this function.
> 
> 
> Guru Mehar Rachaputi (4):
>   staging: vt6655: Add braces to macro parameter 'iobase'
>   staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to inline function
>   staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to inline function
>   staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue changed to inline function
> 
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c        |  4 ++--
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/channel.c     |  4 ++--
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 12 ++++++------
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/mac.c         |  8 ++++----
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/mac.h         | 12 +++++++++---
>  5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Guru
> 

I only see this 0/4 message, no actual patch in the series was sent out.
Did something go wrong?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-07  7:14 [PATCH v2 0/4] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue changed to inline function Guru Mehar Rachaputi
2023-02-07  7:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-02-07  8:42   ` Guru Mehar Rachaputi
2023-02-07  8:40 ` Guru Mehar Rachaputi
2023-02-07  9:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-07  9:36   ` Guru Mehar Rachaputi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+IAZxQTkZpgD1+I@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=forest@alittletooquiet.net \
    --cc=gurumeharrachaputi@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox