public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Anton Gusev <aagusev@ispras.ru>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lvc-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/wlan-ng: Check hfa384x_dowmem result in hfa384x_drvr_flashdl_write
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:26:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+YpzpZ7SXOp2Neu@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230209161836.29991-1-aagusev@ispras.ru>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 07:18:36PM +0300, Anton Gusev wrote:
> In hfa384x_drvr_flashdl_write, hfa384x_dowmem is called in a cycle
> without checking the result. Ignoring an error there may lead to an
> incorrect flash download buffer value during the consequent write.

Did you reproduce this on a running system?

> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

How was this tested?  If not tested you HAVE TO SAY SO!  Especially when
dealing with random tools that we know nothing about.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Gusev <aagusev@ispras.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
> index c7cd54171d99..baac5c02f904 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
> @@ -1880,6 +1880,12 @@ int hfa384x_drvr_flashdl_write(struct hfa384x *hw, u32 daddr,
>  						writepage,
>  						writeoffset,
>  						writebuf, writelen);
> +			if (result) {
> +				netdev_err(hw->wlandev->netdev,
> +					   "dowmem(page=%x,offset=%x,data=%p,len=%d) failed, result=%d. Aborting d/l\n",
> +					   writepage, writeoffset, writebuf, writelen, result);
> +				return result;
> +			}
>  		}
>  
>  		/* set the download 'write flash' mode */
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 
> 

Please fix up your tool, this patch does not follow the pattern of the
rest of the "exit on error" paths in this function so of course I'm not
going to accept this.

At this point, it really really feels like something needs to change
with your submissions, they are not working well :(

{sigh}

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-10 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-09 16:18 [PATCH] staging/wlan-ng: Check hfa384x_dowmem result in hfa384x_drvr_flashdl_write Anton Gusev
2023-02-10 11:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+YpzpZ7SXOp2Neu@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=aagusev@ispras.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox