From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from msg-4.mailo.com (msg-4.mailo.com [213.182.54.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 784A41C37; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:40:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mailo.com; s=mailo; t=1666017620; bh=hrVvHrfFWX/zUmEet33OGmsTs22YqEFCpVEbOT2941k=; h=X-EA-Auth:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=jotFTq2ZV+19JyoHeQwjKH1zmvp3uekpxmVHkwDtO92sKudzUMcXgIsjgP/EeiK3R lO5RvAHDNSUQ/raVeUFlp+1pfVX50UHMLJYOTxsDvkQPESgjcOyyMCEKVLSKCBrO72 lbnxjnXGBT+3yj4Pnuatlz5cIv9xj+W+qzx7cYhM= Received: by b-6.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.16] with ESMTP via [213.182.55.206] Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:40:20 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: KqMRjCz+u0MP0lsX8Hn5F7H1pAy0qTp7ksZUbQgADB2c/8l6MoAXejKcYm5NdGYkcbU56dZXSn2L1DghDG8ILV7OToZ8e6Am Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:40:46 +0530 From: Deepak R Varma To: Greg KH Cc: outreachy@lists.linux.dev, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, phil@philpotter.co.uk, paskripkin@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com, saurabh.truth@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: r8188eu: reformat long computation lines Message-ID: References: <2dd27eff9aab5ffe31e61086c0584982794507cf.1666011479.git.drv@mailo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 04:09:49PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:52:50PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote: > > Reformat long running computation instructions to improve code readability. > > Address following checkpatch script complaints: > > CHECK: line length of 171 exceeds 100 columns > > CHECK: line length of 113 exceeds 100 columns > > > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma > > --- > > drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c > > index 79daf8f269d6..427da7e8ba4c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c > > @@ -211,8 +211,10 @@ static int __nat25_network_hash(unsigned char *network_addr) > > } else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_IPX) { > > unsigned long x; > > > > - x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ > > - network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^ network_addr[10]; > > + x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ > > Why not go out to [4] here and then you are one line shorter? Thank you for the feedback. Arranging 4 on a line still made the line extend 90+ columns. It appeared wide to me. Stacking three in one line made it look better. I will resend the patch with 4 in line and let you suggest if that is acceptable. Thank you, ./drv > > > + network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ network_addr[6] ^ > > + network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^ > > + network_addr[10]; > > > > return x & (NAT25_HASH_SIZE - 1); > > } else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_APPLE) { > > @@ -224,16 +226,20 @@ static int __nat25_network_hash(unsigned char *network_addr) > > } else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_PPPOE) { > > unsigned long x; > > > > - x = network_addr[0] ^ network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8]; > > + x = network_addr[0] ^ network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ > > + network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ > > Same here > > > > + network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8]; > > > > return x & (NAT25_HASH_SIZE - 1); > > } else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_IPV6) { > > unsigned long x; > > > > - x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ > > - network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^ network_addr[10] ^ > > - network_addr[11] ^ network_addr[12] ^ network_addr[13] ^ network_addr[14] ^ network_addr[15] ^ > > - network_addr[16]; > > + x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ > > + network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ network_addr[6] ^ > > + network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^ > > + network_addr[10] ^ network_addr[11] ^ network_addr[12] ^ > > + network_addr[13] ^ network_addr[14] ^ network_addr[15] ^ > > + network_addr[16]; > > And here. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >