From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B036FD6;
	Thu,  3 Nov 2022 13:26:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB275C433C1;
	Thu,  3 Nov 2022 13:26:31 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org;
	s=korg; t=1667481992;
	bh=97o4Fn/VearIoWyrFZioD/aKcRCOwlQ5khIdoWWXOuc=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=zU4d210oOIhnfSQU2SJIOc10ojXs10gdqtpENdtuOVr9dZmNxxI0qM4luqXo6j44K
	 4QQZrFkvI7TYzkFJmY6cbCsDjk39pqL3N1FrqJAj2ASdYUO9GZcmV+szfVtAHgMbNT
	 e9Mq9myzGcezCC+D9V++pEwM3ZEgTeDKEfB7wbIo=
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:27:12 +0900
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: outreachy@lists.linux.dev, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
	Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: replace one element 2D array by 1D
 array
Message-ID: <Y2PBsBEyeO4tTYy0@kroah.com>
References: <Y2OsUYcBYe1fZR1W@qemulion>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <linux-staging.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-staging+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-staging+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y2OsUYcBYe1fZR1W@qemulion>

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 05:26:01PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> A single element two dimensional array is constrained to index 0 for
> that element. This constraint makes it similar to a one dimensional
> array.  Hence convert such array to a simplified one dimensional
> equivalent. Resultant code is simpler and easy to maintain.
> 
> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/HalPhyRf_8188e.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/odm.h        | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/HalPhyRf_8188e.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/HalPhyRf_8188e.c
> index 622f95d3f2ed..c0706c5b3fd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/HalPhyRf_8188e.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/HalPhyRf_8188e.c
> @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ void PHY_IQCalibrate_8188E(struct adapter *adapt, bool recovery)
>  /* by sherry 20120321 */
>  	if (final_candidate < 4) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM; i++)
> -			dm_odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting.Value[0][i] = result[final_candidate][i];
> +			dm_odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting.Value[i] = result[final_candidate][i];

Why is this field only being set and never used?

Is it even needed at all?  If not, why not just remove it entirely?

thanks,

greg k-h