From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5DA4EBEE; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FDC4C433C1; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:00:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1668009650; bh=zrKocyoA9vOJPLuwCmUr/r5EilxVL2Mb3dwLxuOroZw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mGuDVJ3Tf054mVcwp8j38WsBwxdbHFORJu++gSPfcy0bd0ck8y1WHS9XsdlOSlYkM A4DUZ4F1h9blsWxKgD3OZIW6zO5SvN37+G2JDbVO3YeSVfybLbi4booX10/656JESH zK3MSwwLoMxS9PDgnnVoiwiG1R0n5WW5GhNZU+4c= Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:00:47 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Deepak R Varma Cc: Julia Lawall , outreachy@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: Use ARRAY_SIZE() to get argument count Message-ID: References: <7dc9b4d2-413-3f65-1381-b164d810c3ee@inria.fr> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:30:52PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 08:12:11PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 05:31:24PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:05:32PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I took a look, but it's pretty complex. You could take the code and > > > > reorganize it so that it is more readable, and then take the definition of > > > > the ARRAY_SIZE macro, to better see what is going on. > > > > > > > > julia > > > > > > > > > > Hello Greg, Julia, > > > I was able to successfully build the fbtft object file for arm architecture as > > > well. I used gcc 6.5.0 and 9.5.0 tool chains. It was successful using both. I > > > have attached the build log from my machine for your reference. > > > > > > I am also looking at the .i file and rearrange the expanded macro to understand > > > it. However, since it is built successfully, I am not sure if that is truly the > > > problem area. > > > > > > Should I resend the patch and check if it still errors the kernel build bot? > > > Anything else I can try? > > > > Looks like the change I proposed is causing nesting inside the write_reg > > function due to additional set of { & } brackets for the __VA_ARGS__ symbol. > > > > Am I understanding it right? > > Hello Julia, Greg, > I am unable to reproduce this build failure on my local machine. I tried the X86 > and arm based build. I am unable to troubleshoot this further. Do you have any > other suggestions? If not, I will drop this patch from my watch list. Please just drop it, it is not a correct change to make. thanks, greg k-h