From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64D96D0D for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B3F1611CC; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:40:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1617784856; bh=ArCApTSPQQIjlopJ4gguiMxnCzPzOxidZ1gZWuJzWNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PrFrkmHyiuG4I0FT/2BIsTIf5XQBmuvPXHdVrcpvkFJsrvksEjr+yavZnLZ2/3WBP Ik07ve8PAyw/O6vdCkkkkLba248D+tgaU0K9zGF8TwccQn5JmF6eYkNUclDJPq7q4U yFY5RCk6Z7KFulCL3Cc9MMoKNuVPvGWiXuQFtdwk= Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:40:53 +0200 From: Greg KH To: "tiantao (H)" Cc: Tian Tao , hvaibhav.linux@gmail.com, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: move to use request_irq by IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag Message-ID: References: <1617778203-23117-1-git-send-email-tiantao6@hisilicon.com> <5126cb93-4227-8a0f-1421-7685ade4b2e2@huawei.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5126cb93-4227-8a0f-1421-7685ade4b2e2@huawei.com> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:29:59PM +0800, tiantao (H) wrote: > > 在 2021/4/7 16:22, Greg KH 写道: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Tian Tao wrote: > > > disable_irq() after request_irq() still has a time gap in which > > > interrupts can come. request_irq() with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag will > > > disable IRQ auto-enable because of requesting. > > > > > > this patch is made base on "add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq" which > > > is being merged: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1388765/ > > Can you wait until that is merged before sending this out to us as we > > can't do anything until then. > > this is already in linux-next.git. > > cbe16f3 genirq: Add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq/nmi() That's great, but note that linux-next is a combined tree of all subsystem trees. It's impossible for a subsystem tree to include linux-next :) So how about we wait until this gets into Linus's tree so that we do not all suddenly get problems in our individual subsystem trees. thanks, greg k-h