[PATCH] staging: rtl8712: removed unnecessary blank line

[PATCH] staging: rtl8712: removed unnecessary blank line

[Mitali Borkar]

Cleanup patch for CHECK: blank lines aren't necessary after an open
brace '{'
Reported by checkpatch

Signed-off-by: Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c
index dc21e7743349..9038570fb949 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ static int r871xu_drv_init(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf,
 static void r871xu_dev_remove(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf);
 
 static const struct usb_device_id rtl871x_usb_id_tbl[] = {
-
 /* RTL8188SU */
 	/* Realtek */
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x0BDA, 0x8171)},
@@ -441,7 +440,7 @@ static int r871xu_drv_init(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf,
 
 			for (i = 0, offset = 0; i < 128; i += 8, offset++)
 				r8712_efuse_pg_packet_read(padapter, offset,
-						     &pdata[i]);
+							   &pdata[i]);
 
 			if (!r8712_initmac || !mac_pton(r8712_initmac, mac)) {
 				/* Use the mac address stored in the Efuse
@@ -561,10 +560,10 @@ static int r871xu_drv_init(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf,
 			 */
 			mac[0] &= 0xFE;
 			dev_info(&udev->dev,
-				"r8712u: MAC Address from user = %pM\n", mac);
+				 "r8712u: MAC Address from user = %pM\n", mac);
 		} else {
 			dev_info(&udev->dev,
-				"r8712u: MAC Address from efuse = %pM\n", mac);
+				 "r8712u: MAC Address from efuse = %pM\n", mac);
 		}
 		ether_addr_copy(pnetdev->dev_addr, mac);
 	}
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8712: removed unnecessary blank line

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 01:17:49PM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> Cleanup patch for CHECK: blank lines aren't necessary after an open
> brace '{'
> Reported by checkpatch

But you did more than just the above in this patch, which is not ok :(

Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8712: removed unnecessary blank line

[Greg KH]

A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 01:36:07PM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> Okay, should I rename the patch?

I can't take it as-is, so you need to change something :)

> I removed a line and matched alignment, so should I rename this
> appropriately?

Only do one logical thing per patch, so if this is 2 logical things,
then you need 2 patches, right?

thanks,

greg k-h