From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, straube.linux@gmail.com,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove ASSERT and ODM_RT_ASSERT macros
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 08:44:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKyc3AM51xODwW0Q@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524224532.1230-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk>
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:45:32PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Remove the ASSERT and ODM_RT_ASSERT macros from include/odm_debug.h
> as they are unnecessary.
>
> ASSERT does nothing, compiling to a single empty statement.
> ODM_RT_ASSERT is used in only one place, in the ODM_RAStateCheck
> function with hal/odm.c - it seems to have been intended as an
> assertion of some kind, but given it is always called with false
> here, there is little point in it not just being a pr_info() call.
>
> Also, the lines relating to the file, function and line number are
> not needed as the pr_info() with the function name and error message
> is sufficient should anyone wish to track down this error at a source
> level, within what is currently a relatively small function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/odm_debug.h | 13 -------------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c
> index 4d659a812aed..b800d0c6dff5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ bool ODM_RAStateCheck(struct odm_dm_struct *pDM_Odm, s32 RSSI, bool bForceUpdate
> LowRSSIThreshForRA += GoUpGap;
> break;
> default:
> - ODM_RT_ASSERT(pDM_Odm, false, ("wrong rssi level setting %d !", *pRATRState));
> + pr_info("%s(): wrong rssi level setting %d!\n", __func__, *pRATRState);
I know you're just copying what the existing code does, but this really
should just be a dev_err() call instead. It's not "info", and as this
is a driver, dev_*() should be called instead.
So I'll take this one, but for future cleanups, consider changing the
pr_*() calls to the correct ones.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 22:45 [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove ASSERT and ODM_RT_ASSERT macros Phillip Potter
2021-05-25 6:44 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-05-25 20:51 ` Phillip Potter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKyc3AM51xODwW0Q@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox