public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, straube.linux@gmail.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove ASSERT and ODM_RT_ASSERT macros
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 08:44:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKyc3AM51xODwW0Q@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524224532.1230-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk>

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:45:32PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Remove the ASSERT and ODM_RT_ASSERT macros from include/odm_debug.h
> as they are unnecessary.
> 
> ASSERT does nothing, compiling to a single empty statement.
> ODM_RT_ASSERT is used in only one place, in the ODM_RAStateCheck
> function with hal/odm.c - it seems to have been intended as an
> assertion of some kind, but given it is always called with false
> here, there is little point in it not just being a pr_info() call.
> 
> Also, the lines relating to the file, function and line number are
> not needed as the pr_info() with the function name and error message
> is sufficient should anyone wish to track down this error at a source
> level, within what is currently a relatively small function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c           |  2 +-
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/odm_debug.h | 13 -------------
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c
> index 4d659a812aed..b800d0c6dff5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ bool ODM_RAStateCheck(struct odm_dm_struct *pDM_Odm, s32 RSSI, bool bForceUpdate
>  		LowRSSIThreshForRA += GoUpGap;
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		ODM_RT_ASSERT(pDM_Odm, false, ("wrong rssi level setting %d !", *pRATRState));
> +		pr_info("%s(): wrong rssi level setting %d!\n", __func__, *pRATRState);

I know you're just copying what the existing code does, but this really
should just be a dev_err() call instead.  It's not "info", and as this
is a driver, dev_*() should be called instead.

So I'll take this one, but for future cleanups, consider changing the
pr_*() calls to the correct ones.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-24 22:45 [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove ASSERT and ODM_RT_ASSERT macros Phillip Potter
2021-05-25  6:44 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-05-25 20:51   ` Phillip Potter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YKyc3AM51xODwW0Q@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox