public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
	straube.linux@gmail.com, kaixuxia@tencent.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: replace two ODM_RT_TRACE calls in hal/phy.c
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:43:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMKVhgwbfLqWH3bd@KernelVM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609092106.GE1955@kadam>

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 12:21:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 12:56:09AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Within rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust function, retrieve the struct
> > net_device pointer, and replace both calls to the ODM_RT_TRACE macro
> > with equivalent netdev_dbg calls, as well as modifying layout, wording
> > and spacing slightly. The purpose of this, and patches like it, is to
> > eventually remove the need for include/odm_debug.h, which is an overly
> > complex way of printing debug/tracing information about the driver.
> > 
> 
> In the original code DebugComponents is always zero so the ODM_RT_TRACE()
> stuff was dead code and could never be printed.  I would prefer we just
> delete it all instead of fixing it.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

Dear Dan (and Greg),

Thank you for your feedback. I will just remove all the ODM_RT_TRACE
calls in a follow up patch set in that case.

Regards,
Phil

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-08 23:56 [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: replace two ODM_RT_TRACE calls in hal/phy.c Phillip Potter
2021-06-09  9:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-06-10 22:43   ` Phillip Potter [this message]
2021-06-09 10:02 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YMKVhgwbfLqWH3bd@KernelVM \
    --to=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kaixuxia@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox