From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3E272 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C1EE61A0D; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:22:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1627392158; bh=MkPLqPJc1XgJH7AKYbcntWYTSOaXX7Pjfcxk8FnP6Yk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fIXvYIN/seq9bVAkt/WwEuoowe8ns43cdiz9bqjZUsi4gN1fQontbMr8XmxhFir64 ZV1tvc52YgnWsE7jWNdpMD9tzMrvRHZpN3iJOTzoRxdE1uM+MZif7ECzr0tfa+Lo+m kctkR4wMb4ibWZbaiUtYE/OXza2RiB8yliY0xWIY= Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:22:35 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Lee Jones Cc: Lucas Henneman , forest@alittletooquiet.net, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] staging: vt6655: remove filename from baseband.h Message-ID: References: <20210723144340.15787-1-lucas.henneman@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Lucas Henneman wrote: > > > This patch resolves checkpatch's warning, "It's generally not useful to > > have the filename in the file" for baseband.h. > > I would paste the exact warning you get from checkpatch.pl, warts > (line numbers) and all on a completely separate line. > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Henneman > > --- > > drivers/staging/vt6655/baseband.h | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > Nice first attempt at working with Mainline Lucas. > > The premise of the patches seem okay. I don't personally allow > filenames into new commits in subsystems I maintain. > > Seeing as though these patches are *so* trivial, if I were Greg, I'd > be asking you to bundle each of these changes into a single patch. I'll take these as-is, it's fine. thanks, greg k-h