From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: remove RT_TRACE and DBG_88E prints from usb_intf.c
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:07:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQvGcDMLX5OTSzIr@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804141031.12303-1-martin@kaiser.cx>
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 04:10:31PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> We should use the standard mechanism for debug prints. Remove the
> prints that use driver-specific macros.
>
> Handle errors from the usb_autopm_get_interface call instead of just
> showing a debug print.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
> ---
> v2:
> - bring back usb_autopm_get_interface, handle errors
This is a v2 of patch 1 in a series?
Or something else?
When resending a new version, please always send out a whole new series
to make it obvious what to do when reviewing them.
I've dropped this series, please fix up and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-05 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-01 17:30 [PATCH 1/2] staging: r8188eu: remove RT_TRACE and DBG_88E prints from usb_intf.c Martin Kaiser
2021-08-01 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: r8188eu: remove RT_TRACE and DBG_88E prints from usb_ops_linux.c Martin Kaiser
2021-08-04 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: r8188eu: remove RT_TRACE and DBG_88E prints from usb_intf.c Dan Carpenter
2021-08-04 14:13 ` Martin Kaiser
2021-08-04 14:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Martin Kaiser
2021-08-05 11:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQvGcDMLX5OTSzIr@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox