From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B2D2F80 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 06:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0A6261265; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 06:00:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1632981606; bh=+9Cimias7j0INGICFeEb++U9FTUPDMbOhsM3g32/A/w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FJ9v3kPBgadWq9TqyDSkBB+ZjCCPeEb68cegwt58vk1kS1yM5e1cWDPYnwdpXz2Cv hAKlC9vcnNclW3U+9HxmV1aUWWR+JTuIuDnK9Rxanfkl55bGXaFDXvyYWTPXlXtKts dpVzVAdvmFM3U1qB5YQ8EQXj7BsZyEXZ8RjlCM9o= Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:00:01 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Dawid Esterhuizen Cc: Larry Finger , Florian Schilhabel , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8712: Statements should start on a tabstop Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:34:46PM +0200, Dawid Esterhuizen wrote: > This path fixes four checkpatch.pl warnings: > > Statements should start on a tabstop > > Signed-off-by: Dawid Esterhuizen > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.h | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.h > index 2e6afc7bb0a1..bc1287cc853e 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.h > @@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ struct sta_xmit_priv { > }; > > struct hw_txqueue { > - /*volatile*/ sint head; > - /*volatile*/ sint tail; > - /*volatile*/ sint free_sz; /*in units of 64 bytes*/ > - /*volatile*/ sint free_cmdsz; > - /*volatile*/ sint txsz[8]; > + /*volatile*/ sint head; > + /*volatile*/ sint tail; > + /*volatile*/ sint free_sz; /*in units of 64 bytes*/ > + /*volatile*/ sint free_cmdsz; > + /*volatile*/ sint txsz[8]; I think you now have added a new checkpatch warning, right? This is not the correct indentation anymore, why not work to see if you can remove the volatile comment instead? thanks, greg k-h