Re: [PATCH 0/3] staging: r8188eu: use completions and clean rtw_cmd_thread()

[Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>]

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 11:10:39AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> This series replaces two semaphores with three completion variables
> in rtw_cmd_thread(). Completions variables are better suited for the
> purposes that are explained in detail in the commit messages of patches
> 1/3 and 2/3. Furthermore, patch 3/3 removes a redundant 'if' statement
> from that same rtw_cmd_thread().
> 
> Tested with ASUSTek Computer, Inc. Realtek 8188EUS [USB-N10 Nano]
> 
> Many thanks to Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> who helped with
> his review of the RFC Patch.
> 
> Fabio M. De Francesco (3):
>   staging: r8188eu: Use completions for signaling start and end of
>     kthread
>   staging: r8188eu: Use completions for signaling enqueueing of commands
>   staging: r8188eu: Remove redundant 'if' statement
> 
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c    | 19 +++++++------------
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_cmd.h |  5 +++--
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c |  8 +++++---
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

Dear Fabio,

Built and tested on my USB-N10 Nano, working well. In terms of how
you've split the patches out, I have no problem with it personally,
given that one semaphore was there for kthread start/stop and the other
for queuing. Looks good to me anyway based on what I know of completion
variables :-) I assume you've not made the waits killable or
interruptible in patch 1 due to the fact they are specifically related
to kthread start/stop? Anyhow:

For whole series:
Acked-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>

Regards,
Phil