From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com [209.85.221.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB702C83 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id e3so35541095wrc.11 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 05:27:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition; bh=caezwCrYl8J1Db0QePppJD41dRvS6Lu7c4xekHw9rc4=; b=ogmUBzFMtrtluJm3LUTqmaT3xo5LmNaCfiKBDJfpkOna8f++9MsCVdJN50yligWLWW hEm3iq2vrBpiP2gERFUx9lJh/6lpuevO2zC29sADMUWrP0nWnEZiSAB5L1TXZrh3Uds0 XWc4TkTPNc5LXYW7N4biGbzW1GdjvskA9F7tc4JE3PBLM+knEMGA232U23+XehALgJnx midr0kGTqtt4mVvi0WbsXIxdQ+dFlFX8Sos/HWGjyh2Zc10DHjYNS+ZgRNf5SnlxBbDH En5nPcptw02TFAlnGI/8JrcX5hWlzPcm/UFp4Z9F9DbLCzDdPgFvPxD/ZnJ3YeawQ5VS 3jzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition; bh=caezwCrYl8J1Db0QePppJD41dRvS6Lu7c4xekHw9rc4=; b=i1ABNm7lNa8ptaMMZNaXmLJVl5TbwbdHdR2eThdi3MDdeVDABb2rB8bo7NryQrfGEU eB8l22fCl64BtCjWNnqPvIgSSpJlCRputQhjVHe/PxeFuwxZyUVNRKTMyntjrZhYNCCY zBGf5pdoXroomk64m4Xv9ZdEl8TOx0mO4MdV9hpWLquWB3zddy4ZXZtt67kjR78U4QeK 5MmEM8Ja/9PC7Xts5rZPZOUKZZH5Be4YBh2PssYLGhTNKiwQfIK3kqZvjE/2/EN/GvB5 XE+ml/YG7qqgyavqcUUzrkhXv32HULqBIxbGsSMCqj2yM2knNWPry/CEPkorwBTyo0IN Xs5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NdMzcWvZ28R+jKE0gsQOUhCqXOdJTBZ/rZ9eFBrGTXqIvECN9 WrYMLwYi91nPyoeDLj+bmO0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvGs5Kt+CDR6iUtIq0Pynnn7nw1r8K/anNW4nGI6k1FzSzZBcNGXx9uPVf0gRWbUHvA5OC8Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:aad7:: with SMTP id i23mr27699723wrc.209.1634473634405; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mononoke (56.red-88-27-247.staticip.rima-tde.net. [88.27.247.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o12sm9713965wrv.78.2021.10.17.05.27.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 17 Oct 2021 05:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 14:27:12 +0200 From: Sebastian Luchetti To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: ms.c: Remove two udelay calls and use usleep_range instead Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline This patch fixes the issue: CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt in two occurrences. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Luchetti --- drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c index 2a6fab5c117a..7292c8f013fd 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c @@ -3236,7 +3236,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk, return STATUS_FAIL; } - udelay(30); + usleep_range(27, 32); rtsx_init_cmd(chip); @@ -4158,7 +4158,7 @@ int mg_set_ICV(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip) #ifdef MG_SET_ICV_SLOW for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { - udelay(50); + usleep_range(47, 52); rtsx_init_cmd(chip); -- 2.30.2