From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0989668 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 15:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E976060F3A; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 15:18:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1635779887; bh=6cXhMwsgVW8VcGg5gqT9SlVFJ1jBKf7oyZwsB1UQ2uM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ae0zT3Ti9YXpkFV1H6UBCJ7uPAKqddaLmMPtkRYOPS5G0J3UT6Caabyawcfz3fHGw AOuH9k3u7q65IU0hyNrptIZkNwlkjErTz513uHvwwc4fhK3lCW0FFN0S674xR00A3X QFyGaIkb5/tlr10E1NM6o5j+NZU6jJpXsejev63k= Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:18:03 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" Cc: Larry Finger , Phillip Potter , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: Use kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC in atomic context Message-ID: References: <20211101142732.5638-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211101142732.5638-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > Use the GFP_ATOMIC flag of kzalloc() with two memory allocation in > report_del_sta_event(). This function is called while holding spinlocks, > therefore it is not allowed to sleep. With the GFP_ATOMIC type flag, the > allocation is high priority and must not sleep. > > This issue is detected by Smatch which emits the following warning: > "drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:6848 report_del_sta_event() > warn: sleeping in atomic context". > > After the change, the post-commit hook output the following message: > "CHECK: Prefer kzalloc(sizeof(*pcmd_obj)...) over > kzalloc(sizeof(struct cmd_obj)...)". > > According to the above "CHECK", use the preferred style in the first > kzalloc(). > > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco > --- > > v1->v2: Fix an overlooked error due to an incorrect copy-paste > of the sizeof() operator. What commit does this fix? thanks, greg k-h