public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, phil@philpotter.co.uk,
	straube.linux@gmail.com, martin@kaiser.cx,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: os_dep: remove the goto statement
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:53:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYT/LibxFzssNUJN@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYKvWeyqd71pYSqM@Sauravs-MacBook-Air.local>

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:18:41PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> Remove the goto statement from rtw_init_drv_sw(). In this function goto
> can be replace by return statement. As on goto label exit, function
> only return it is not performing any cleanup. Avoiding goto will
> improve the function readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> ChangelogV2:
> 
> 	-On V1 combined the if condition check for functions as below
> 
> 	 if (!rtw_init_evt_priv(&padapter->evtpriv) || !rtw_init_mlme_priv(padapter))
> 		return _FAIL;
> 	reverting these changes and keeping them as-is. It will make more clear on
> 	individual function call if something need to handle for error case.
> 
> ChangelogV1:
> 
> 	-Remove the goto statement from rtw_init_drv_sw(). In this function goto
> 	 can be replace by return statement. As on goto label exit, function
> 	 only return it is not performing any cleanup. Avoiding goto will
> 	 improve the function readability.
> 
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c | 34 ++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c
> index 1418c9c4916c..ec96e837ab88 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c
> @@ -480,48 +480,37 @@ u8 rtw_init_drv_sw(struct adapter *padapter)
>  {
>  	u8	ret8 = _SUCCESS;
> 
> -	if ((rtw_init_cmd_priv(&padapter->cmdpriv)) == _FAIL) {
> -		ret8 = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> -	}
> +	if ((rtw_init_cmd_priv(&padapter->cmdpriv)) == _FAIL)
> +		return _FAIL;
> 
>  	padapter->cmdpriv.padapter = padapter;
> 
> -	if ((rtw_init_evt_priv(&padapter->evtpriv)) == _FAIL) {
> -		ret8 = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> -	}
> +	if ((rtw_init_evt_priv(&padapter->evtpriv)) == _FAIL)
> +		return _FAIL;
> 
> -	if (rtw_init_mlme_priv(padapter) == _FAIL) {
> -		ret8 = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> -	}
> +	if (rtw_init_mlme_priv(padapter) == _FAIL)
> +		return _FAIL;
> 
>  	rtw_init_wifidirect_timers(padapter);
>  	init_wifidirect_info(padapter, P2P_ROLE_DISABLE);
>  	reset_global_wifidirect_info(padapter);
> 
> -	if (init_mlme_ext_priv(padapter) == _FAIL) {
> -		ret8 = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> -	}
> +	if (init_mlme_ext_priv(padapter) == _FAIL)
> +		return _FAIL;
> 
>  	if (_rtw_init_xmit_priv(&padapter->xmitpriv, padapter) == _FAIL) {
>  		DBG_88E("Can't _rtw_init_xmit_priv\n");
> -		ret8 = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> +		return _FAIL;
>  	}
> 
>  	if (_rtw_init_recv_priv(&padapter->recvpriv, padapter) == _FAIL) {
>  		DBG_88E("Can't _rtw_init_recv_priv\n");
> -		ret8 = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> +		return _FAIL;
>  	}
> 
>  	if (_rtw_init_sta_priv(&padapter->stapriv) == _FAIL) {
>  		DBG_88E("Can't _rtw_init_sta_priv\n");
> -		ret8 = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> +		return _FAIL;
>  	}
> 
>  	padapter->stapriv.padapter = padapter;

Right after this, ret8 is set, but never checked, which looks like a bug
to me.  Can you work on fixing that after I take this patch?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-05  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-03 15:48 [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: os_dep: remove the goto statement Saurav Girepunje
2021-11-05  9:53 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-11-05 10:36   ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-11-05 17:18     ` Saurav Girepunje

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YYT/LibxFzssNUJN@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@gmail.com \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox