From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nautica.notk.org (nautica.notk.org [91.121.71.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD06C53A4 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id D716BC024; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:22:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1646047354; bh=nbIjFrzgDVTmB4SrJnZGd7fIFmdwChwe2lL83Uag4us=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KzQ5VK5bfQJ50dqk23dxDjUwDDK7TA/irQD0Z9CNQKb+g550mz4220rMxu0PuRkB0 zSH1KEphDNBJ7hKNULh8KlQjyIdBHOs8MI/nUYoPBmpLppCasulnFAsrKdaEXzwMTJ IwpM9+gWlHHqb/G70sMsoon8bZGjqe3igvlHvXWdB+dQG/WEtTlWyekznVAIp4LN7e b5pg6TDJ9pKPwGgBdsioef4sXDvyaKtcCCYy35g3YAfKpCdoJctnMsERag3cdTSjTi 8bbBH2/ntqNttGvGikrePwX+5MLUaZ7SwFWR8e1TQHG1akbelVXWBNaL48rZXDJvyO 7HTqyJ/PLNd5Q== X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on nautica.notk.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6162EC009; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:22:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1646047353; bh=nbIjFrzgDVTmB4SrJnZGd7fIFmdwChwe2lL83Uag4us=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E7ShsxTdVoGEbpDYFF27HXnsiskOzo+90fWYK/YK/pcgewcio/aI2ukKBbk8Ggf8c PSXNNRohBAnroHDgJmzD26WOCBS51v3CgaeWJoVRlz3gzi1Wk2c722FgVeG9ZC8Gq1 VxeMBZJsJJ2s49Z0zkRuzCFT0FdEMmJ4Jlg8so5xUNkI1Pmhr9T77hNpqbhc5MUSIm Vf9CZqLUP+U5LMthWxqmxcIfa+qcI6C/HHTtBGWVbD6UPJLDQeI2MK30nqaJN3mP3G MxeZ4iTWnejwYcukxHfaPz9ZlYf9Zxp1r7k3O+mRBYZR8EPZsNImCl3hToWu78+1r5 3QpJ5t/64l3TQ== Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 8186bc45; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 20:22:01 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Jakob Koschel Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-arch , Thomas Gleixner , Arnd Bergman , Andy Shevchenko , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Mike Rapoport , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Brian Johannesmeyer , Cristiano Giuffrida , "Bos, H.J." , Christophe JAILLET , Dan Carpenter , Jason Gunthorpe , Rasmus Villemoes , Nathan Chancellor , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] treewide: remove check of list iterator against head past the loop body Message-ID: References: <20220228110822.491923-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> <20220228110822.491923-7-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220228110822.491923-7-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> This is a bit more work (and a lot more noise), but I'd prefer if this were split into as many patches as there are components. I'm not going to review the parts of the patches that don't concern me, and if something turns out to be a problem later one (it shouldn't but one never knows) it'll be much easier to revert or put the blame on an individual smaller commit than on this... With that being said, ultimately I don't care that much and will leave that to people who do :) Jakob Koschel wrote on Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:08:22PM +0100: > net/9p/trans_xen.c | 11 +++-- This 9p change looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Dominique Martinet # 9p -- Dominique