From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0935228E5; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46BB2C385A0; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:46:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1649166367; bh=tEPAy+NbytRr8LPw00hVjTlHe62y4ooPjjnn32amCII=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OyNi6FyvaNdAHMo2HEF5qEjBKMeMUTU3O/vPvFBgdkzXewf1tDQ+QF0VMQIG3TTrx sr/y65z0al95dQNkLplZ3mcnx9HCK4sJFFf8gQjgzLIJ8sohAxlK86eIHYgOca+g2n iacvEz+fISPqWVOzWMP3bo8LeSGYymg4P8JaHOFg= Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 15:45:49 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Larry Finger Cc: Alaa Mohamed , outreachy@lists.linux.dev, phil@philpotter.co.uk, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: r8188eu: Add line after declarations Message-ID: References: <860d8e222e2b695ce5cb4f48aa46a7f66e05d8e4.1649082939.git.eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com> <19d8f316e43d16c9341f7fe94e68534cf60cc05c.1649082939.git.eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:47:33PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > On 4/4/22 09:39, Alaa Mohamed wrote: > > Reported by checkpatch: > > > > WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations > > > > Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed > > --- > > drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c > > index 7c664f80fa99..f7811b46db1c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c > > @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ void nat25_db_cleanup(struct adapter *priv) > > for (i = 0; i < NAT25_HASH_SIZE; i++) { > > struct nat25_network_db_entry *f; > > + > > f = priv->nethash[i]; > > while (f) { > > struct nat25_network_db_entry *g; > > @@ -339,12 +340,12 @@ void nat25_db_expire(struct adapter *priv) > > for (i = 0; i < NAT25_HASH_SIZE; i++) { > > struct nat25_network_db_entry *f; > > - f = priv->nethash[i]; > > + f = priv->nethash[i]; > > while (f) { > > struct nat25_network_db_entry *g; > > - g = f->next_hash; > > + g = f->next_hash; > > if (__nat25_has_expired(f)) { > > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&f->use_count)) { > > if (priv->scdb_entry == f) { > > Acked_by: Larry Finger > > That applies to both patches. b4 doesn't pick this ack up for both patches, you either need to do it on the 0/X message, or on each one individually. thanks, greg k-h