From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A0C10E5 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCD09C385A0; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1651159400; bh=fotImP6RjEaX7iNcOVKBbxLYwLOMLdnMO2tvTLVJfxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HDVzZLWsl3lH8dn5oJJ4v8Ahr6iSPfe1t6jAyTAiIxBbvadQiMWISP+uOcoQ3CisD ZCQY3OyXU1AwDBw1NnXkqRZzVz+eTGSbsf22eegVnuWPC23RiKmDh1mznaL9LyG2Er j5ZtMKesZGM9EfUxFfAnX/bQDFUVhpO2f1rqP1Ro= Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:23:17 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Adrien Thierry Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: vchiq_arm: use standard print helpers Message-ID: References: <20220428150550.261499-1-athierry@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220428150550.261499-1-athierry@redhat.com> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:05:49AM -0400, Adrien Thierry wrote: > Replace the custom debug print macros with the standard dev_err() and > friends. > > This handles TODO item "Cleanup logging mechanism". > > Signed-off-by: Adrien Thierry > --- > > Changes since v1: removed function name in dev_dbg() calls > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 157 +++--- > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c | 7 +- > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.h | 4 +- > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 495 ++++++++---------- > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 43 +- > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_debugfs.c | 105 ---- > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c | 86 ++- > 7 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 556 deletions(-) Try doing this in smaller chunks. There's a lot of churn here, and not all of it is correct. Try removing these one-function-at-a-time and then when it's all finished, you can remove the debugfs and function calls as no one is calling them. That way it's also easier to review, as-is, this is a tough review. Would you want to review this at once? A few odd things that jumped out at me: > @@ -1332,6 +1325,8 @@ vchiq_keepalive_thread_func(void *v) > struct vchiq_state *state = (struct vchiq_state *)v; > struct vchiq_arm_state *arm_state = vchiq_platform_get_arm_state(state); > > + struct device *dev = state->dev; > + Checkpatch should have warned you about the extra blank line here. Put all variables one after each other please. > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static void connected_init(void) > * be made immediately, otherwise it will be deferred until > * vchiq_call_connected_callbacks is called. > */ > -void vchiq_add_connected_callback(void (*callback)(void)) > +void vchiq_add_connected_callback(struct device *dev, void (*callback)(void)) Pass in the real vchiq device pointer, not a struct device. > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.h > @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ > #ifndef VCHIQ_CONNECTED_H > #define VCHIQ_CONNECTED_H > > -void vchiq_add_connected_callback(void (*callback)(void)); > +#include Don't include the .h file here, it shouldn't be needed if you make this the same real device type. > > struct vchiq_state { > + struct device *dev; Careful now, have you properly handled the reference counting? I can't tell so you should do this type of change on it's own to make it obvious you handle it properly. > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c > @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ static const char *const ioctl_names[] = { > "CLOSE_DELIVERED" > }; > > +static struct miscdevice vchiq_miscdev; That looks really odd. If you create this, where are you initializing it? Did you test this code? thanks, greg k-h