From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch (mail-4322.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 522C31F0E52 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 13:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743773725; cv=none; b=LPR10P4CIiyDdc6Ca3iAJOE6R2/rkPzX9zEkhzirBVMLbSnBC5pzGLPcdyV+BN9aHWwC1Y0Hs9giIaCQMLSYYe3S++0zmh8WjYw7DvMXC+z91A9cuhIIcVqFTQGt0Qx60O4ONN4OVHCwVIXIiBJyxjZbTk0L5On6g58gjILXmpA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743773725; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iSPqErZxC4LadBJfw/bHoBjcJYWzig0oMNRs5w/4daA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KNi/JIDavetBOJrrVM9sZ+n8FBtyh/pZB2HfghG7nl1LYNvyMOWxHyvabf0/oBopYXZLmUUTQc8S33+RGliRyvzU5KGBAbhilCrQ8YsuDgBDicZKRnlcKRRwROe64hRMkwofEh9P3ESCSSIsrvefy+EN41h7RDZ9wE2wIeUq6mI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=Sa45lJWz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="Sa45lJWz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1743773716; x=1744032916; bh=iSPqErZxC4LadBJfw/bHoBjcJYWzig0oMNRs5w/4daA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector: List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=Sa45lJWz/EQuYqoeQSPIKNAq2n/Bx3vI4xmmSObtiUb5OZgezFvnmJJyaVNEjBDxY GVCaWaypX0eSfqs3eLX/Q2dQhDdoZLBsNxeCZDDyJ+rHFkAVbek+nnL46rYLotomHN QrQn5wXpHikX0qp4fOIx+yPdbEYsLeKF7kvarABgVsNFvCe20VLnlqvpH8Sw5XFGoH PiRfS4ClrukL8Bd8+3hhoFXYzn8L0beZPDEbR0if2q/f694ePobWYuLRwN6agcCqyS C92T3vKGY0h6Nr8BktmNl/s0Z7ue+EFy91wILjvbc8nB9ke/nBq6AntloZEJ6c6WHs Xtifi/Zef4c6Q== Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 13:35:11 +0000 To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org From: Bryant Boatright Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8723bs: Fix unbalanced braces in conditional Message-ID: Feedback-ID: 74848953:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 12c1f626f44bc9f7b326b4fee82961bcbc9f9555 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Only one branch of conditional statement is a single statement thus both branches should use braces to adhere to the Linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch: CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement Signed-off-by: Bryant Boatright --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl= 8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c index 64ce33c6fba1..5fd635a4c632 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c @@ -273,9 +273,9 @@ struct=09cmd_obj=09*_rtw_dequeue_cmd(struct __queue *qu= eue) =20 =09/* spin_lock_bh(&(queue->lock)); */ =09spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, irqL); -=09if (list_empty(&queue->queue)) +=09if (list_empty(&queue->queue)) { =09=09obj =3D NULL; -=09else { +=09} else { =09=09obj =3D container_of(get_next(&queue->queue), struct cmd_obj, list); =09=09list_del_init(&obj->list); =09} --=20 2.43.0