[PATCH 1/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove unnecessary kfree statements

[PATCH 1/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove unnecessary kfree statements

[Archana]

The function uses goto free_result in rest of its implementation.

Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
index 02a2191d5c4d..98ed9bb9192c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
@@ -1008,12 +1008,11 @@ static int writeimage(struct wlandevice *wlandev, struct imgchunk *fchunk,
 	rstmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rstmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	rwrmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rwrmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!rstmsg || !rwrmsg) {
-		kfree(rstmsg);
-		kfree(rwrmsg);
 		netdev_err(wlandev->netdev,
 			   "%s: no memory for firmware download, aborting download\n",
 			   __func__);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		result = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_result;
 	}
 
 	/* Initialize the messages */
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove else statement

[Archana]

else block is not needed if j is set to -1
before if block

Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
index 98ed9bb9192c..11658865ca50 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
@@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ static int plugimage(struct imgchunk *fchunk, unsigned int nfchunks,
 	for (i = 0; i < ns3plug; i++) {
 		pstart = s3plug[i].addr;
 		pend = s3plug[i].addr + s3plug[i].len;
+		j = -1;
 		/* find the matching PDR (or filename) */
 		if (s3plug[i].itemcode != 0xffffffffUL) { /* not filename */
 			for (j = 0; j < pda->nrec; j++) {
@@ -696,8 +697,6 @@ static int plugimage(struct imgchunk *fchunk, unsigned int nfchunks,
 				    le16_to_cpu(pda->rec[j]->code))
 					break;
 			}
-		} else {
-			j = -1;
 		}
 		if (j >= pda->nrec && j != -1) { /*  if no matching PDR, fail */
 			pr_warn("warning: Failed to find PDR for plugrec 0x%04x.\n",
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove else statement

[Dan Carpenter]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:59:17PM +0000, Archana wrote:
> else block is not needed if j is set to -1
> before if block
> 
> Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
> ---

Is Archana your full legal name that you would write on a legal document?

I feel like the patch is nice and I like that it's based on reading the
code instead of checkpatch.  The commit message isn't great.  Here is my
suggestion on that:

Subject: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: small clean up in plugimage()

It's cleaner to set "j = -1;" before the if block and remove the else
statement.

The main differences are:
1: It says that the motivation for the patch is a clean up.
2: Capital letter at the start of the sentence.
3: Period at the end.

I try not to be too picky about commit messages but the issue with your
legal name is important so you were going to have to resend anyway.
Also everyone can use capital letters and periods even if English is not
their first language.  We could figure out the motivation for the patch
easily enough but we like to be extra strict with new people so they
develop good habbits.

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove else statement

[Dan Carpenter]

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:34:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:59:17PM +0000, Archana wrote:
> > else block is not needed if j is set to -1
> > before if block
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> Is Archana your full legal name that you would write on a legal document?

Ah, never mind.  Apparently this policy has been updated.  Pseudonyms
are allowed for people concerned about privacy but anonymous
contributions are not allowed.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZAoMxSPKNLoLg7Wl@aschofie-mobl2/

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove else statement

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:58:51AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:34:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:59:17PM +0000, Archana wrote:
> > > else block is not needed if j is set to -1
> > > before if block
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Is Archana your full legal name that you would write on a legal document?
> 
> Ah, never mind.  Apparently this policy has been updated.  Pseudonyms
> are allowed for people concerned about privacy but anonymous
> contributions are not allowed.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZAoMxSPKNLoLg7Wl@aschofie-mobl2/

That being said, I still have to ask this same question anyway, so it's
ok to ask this.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove unnecessary kfree statements

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:59:16PM +0000, Archana wrote:
> The function uses goto free_result in rest of its implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
> index 02a2191d5c4d..98ed9bb9192c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
> @@ -1008,12 +1008,11 @@ static int writeimage(struct wlandevice *wlandev, struct imgchunk *fchunk,
>  	rstmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rstmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	rwrmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rwrmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!rstmsg || !rwrmsg) {
> -		kfree(rstmsg);
> -		kfree(rwrmsg);
>  		netdev_err(wlandev->netdev,
>  			   "%s: no memory for firmware download, aborting download\n",
>  			   __func__);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		result = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto free_result;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Initialize the messages */
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in
  order to properly describe the change.

- It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either
  the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to
  match).  Please read the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for how to do this
  correctly.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

[PATCH v2 1/2] staging: wlan-ng: small cleanup in writeimage()

[Archana]

It is cleaner to use "goto free_result;" as is being followed
in rest of the implementation of writeimage function, and
remove unnecessary kfree statements.

Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
  - Make the commit message more clearer.

 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
index 02a2191d5c4d..98ed9bb9192c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
@@ -1008,12 +1008,11 @@ static int writeimage(struct wlandevice *wlandev, struct imgchunk *fchunk,
 	rstmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rstmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	rwrmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rwrmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!rstmsg || !rwrmsg) {
-		kfree(rstmsg);
-		kfree(rwrmsg);
 		netdev_err(wlandev->netdev,
 			   "%s: no memory for firmware download, aborting download\n",
 			   __func__);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		result = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_result;
 	}
 
 	/* Initialize the messages */
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: small cleanup in plugimage()

[Archana]

It's cleaner to set "j = -1;" before the if block and remove the else
statement.

Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
  - Make the commit message more clearer.

 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
index 98ed9bb9192c..11658865ca50 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
@@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ static int plugimage(struct imgchunk *fchunk, unsigned int nfchunks,
 	for (i = 0; i < ns3plug; i++) {
 		pstart = s3plug[i].addr;
 		pend = s3plug[i].addr + s3plug[i].len;
+		j = -1;
 		/* find the matching PDR (or filename) */
 		if (s3plug[i].itemcode != 0xffffffffUL) { /* not filename */
 			for (j = 0; j < pda->nrec; j++) {
@@ -696,8 +697,6 @@ static int plugimage(struct imgchunk *fchunk, unsigned int nfchunks,
 				    le16_to_cpu(pda->rec[j]->code))
 					break;
 			}
-		} else {
-			j = -1;
 		}
 		if (j >= pda->nrec && j != -1) { /*  if no matching PDR, fail */
 			pr_warn("warning: Failed to find PDR for plugrec 0x%04x.\n",
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: wlan-ng: small cleanup in writeimage()

[Dan Carpenter]

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 12:12:52PM +0000, Archana wrote:
> It is cleaner to use "goto free_result;" as is being followed
> in rest of the implementation of writeimage function, and
> remove unnecessary kfree statements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - Make the commit message more clearer.

Thanks.  Both look good to me now.

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove else statement

[Archana]

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 08:39:50AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:58:51AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:34:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:59:17PM +0000, Archana wrote:
> > > > else block is not needed if j is set to -1
> > > > before if block
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Archana <craechal@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Is Archana your full legal name that you would write on a legal document?

Yes, Archana is my full legal name.

Thank you for your feedbacks.

I have sent revised patch.

Regards,
Archana

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove unnecessary kfree statements

[Archana]

Hey,

- I am not sure why i am getting the description error. I had
  sent a v2 patch version on which i haven't received this review.
- My real name is Archana.

Can you please guide me on what is required from my end to close this patch?

Thanks,
Archana

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: wlan-ng: remove unnecessary kfree statements

[Archana]

Please ignore the previous message.
This patch is closed.

Thanks,
Archana