public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy@lists.linux.dev, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: greybus: use inline function for macros
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 16:42:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBh+3W4eTL9IMW3n@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320103258.6461-1-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:32:58PM +0200, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
> Convert `to_gbphy_dev` and `to_gbphy_driver` macros into a
> static inline function.
> 
> it is not great to have macro that use `container_of` macro,
> because from looking at the definition one cannot tell what type
> it applies to.
> 
> One can get the same benefit from an efficiency point of view
> by making an inline function.
> 
> Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com>
> ---
> change in v2:
> 	remove newlines added in previous patch.
> 
> change in v3:
> 	fix the patch to be against Greg's tree.

I am lost in a twisty maze of patches from you for the greybus code that
all seem alike but are different :(

Can you send a patch series of the latest changes you have made, as I
really don't know what is, and is not, the latest versions at all, so
I'm going to have to drop them all from my review queue right now.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 10:32 [PATCH v3] staging: greybus: use inline function for macros Menna Mahmoud
2023-03-20 15:42 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-03-20 18:27   ` Menna Mahmoud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBh+3W4eTL9IMW3n@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox