From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com (mail-ej1-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D1F11CB8 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99bcf2de59cso438673266b.0 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:57:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693234649; x=1693839449; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WYkAe7NQaVeDP5OA8zcaPDgJkUgX7N7r1SPuR8WIwUA=; b=rQGRDIpppn/BRfyMuxZOBXfzA/M3kiT8RMbs6zg2WjZaMb0EvvFwQtdf5DtU9LmHDT zb6ts8w2v9iaLUShPhxUem/KcaVXIdeoTX6zYOTgQHxhAH4Lk2OObjyF/Jnh3kSqpRFk NyoIgL0eUcs9yyjKg09jOmBPx/Bb5rT3rG4LCkz2toBtMsiNPbdoROVq9hlo5jRZHCkE D7of23X+Ta3ZVdtQtdB57fS7s4ojK5ANcBS7YInWDrAn7YZGwS5JsIijz+XADpnUsfDh QXTpfFUvdZfFeHiJz3X0hJY/rnANcl15eUHDehEI5lg9RRQvSJQah+DzvwLTYN9yWFcc 53sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693234649; x=1693839449; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WYkAe7NQaVeDP5OA8zcaPDgJkUgX7N7r1SPuR8WIwUA=; b=U4Rl0/JDXyuvRDev1BNoltypnppXX4G33TUflN+71rsLE0ruqtIU2z7/XlFHUzXzwe BpPQRD1jnYB9ZPlQhnXD/thZJRpA0Ps1LBNFcTjoOlObvhLYKWPWeAuXjiLkC5N/TOdT Ayt8MZ10NU2ghdoZIQMrBdQlwQV+Fa9V34HeYKivFqcFBsyPtKTQ+61RjiAMqneWNCL4 7m5pIyF3idMz+t8WPRtwrgsCVsTVRvGjvawx5alqZkVxlDaJAyoqUWTm6BWYvWr3MnWM PrHW2NNxYGjuR2TIF0LxgoYUODmWRcAIja8gse+cATByhbegrQiczIS2nuFDYi9jsw81 8UNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwcBbimkROUv4GTbvWqbwk07Vs4taEB/gLUmjUrUAXFY7WZjfFz hahdayq2WT/sXbdyc3DNzDrZMj+DXmc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFg9zzdb59NtlI0AIGBTSMSAhQM6frf2jFV/srcK9SjHU/uyD45EAxs6DF6qb1ZHfGgKjJ6CA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5a64:b0:9a4:6437:3256 with SMTP id my36-20020a1709065a6400b009a464373256mr7076564ejc.39.1693234649007; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nam-dell (ip-217-105-46-58.ip.prioritytelecom.net. [217.105.46.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fj9-20020a1709069c8900b00992e265495csm4708621ejc.212.2023.08.28.07.57.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 16:57:27 +0200 From: Nam Cao To: ozlinux@hotmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, colin.i.king@gmail.com, sumitraartsy@gmail.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:44:42AM -0400, ozlinux@hotmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:39:13AM -0400, Oliver Crumrine wrote: > > > Make the octeon ethernet driver better conform to the linux kernel coding standards > > > > > > Oliver Crumrine (6): > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > > > > drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet.c | 6 ++-- > > > drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h | 50 +++++++++++++-------------- > > > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.39.3 > > > > > > > The patches themselves should also be sent with this cover letter. Instead they > > are sent in a different thread :( > > > > Best regards, > > Nam > > Looking at the what I sent, all the patches should be in reply to > , both according to the patch > that was created by git format-patch, and Outlook. If in-reply-to and > the thread are 2 different things, please let me know, and instruct me on > how I should put the patches in the same thread. You seem to do it correctly, so sorry but I also do not know what went wrong. Maybe someone who knows more about email can help here. Best regards, Nam