From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Frederich <jfrederich@gmail.com>,
Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: olpc_dcon: Remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 14:30:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTz++FupTVs/vOxX@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da3070d9-e016-4167-843f-a08d5b2dc1fe@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1684 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:49:21PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> olpc_dcon is the only remaining i2c client device driver declaring
> I2C_CLASS_DDC support after the legacy eeprom driver has been removed.
>
> olpc_dcon is only used on olpc devices, connected to an i2c adapter
> driven by scx200_acb. This adapter driver declares support for
> I2C_CLASS_HWMON and I2C_CLASS_SPD. Therefore we can safely drop
> I2C_CLASS_DDC support in olpc_dcon.
>
> That's the last step before I2C_CLASS_DDC can be removed in general.
>
> This patch is solely based on documentation, and I don't have an olpc
> device for testing. Therefore some testing would be appreciated before
> patch is applied.
Yes, testing would be good, for sure. Still, I think we can apply it
even without. Because we are not dealing with HW features here, but only
with the Linux internal handling of i2c adapter classes. So:
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c
> index d5271eac1..08ec3aae9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver dcon_driver = {
> .name = "olpc_dcon",
> .pm = &dcon_pm_ops,
> },
> - .class = I2C_CLASS_DDC | I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> + .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> .id_table = dcon_idtable,
> .probe = dcon_probe,
> .remove = dcon_remove,
> --
> 2.42.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-28 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 20:49 [PATCH] staging: olpc_dcon: Remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support Heiner Kallweit
2023-10-28 12:30 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTz++FupTVs/vOxX@shikoro \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jfrederich@gmail.com \
--cc=jon.nettleton@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox