public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minu Jin <s9430939@naver.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com,
	zxcv2569763104@gmail.com, milospuric856@gmail.com,
	karanja99erick@gmail.com, weibu@redadmin.org,
	dan.carpenter@linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read()
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:26:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXMiwivUd_j79kZS@JMW-Ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026012336-filter-starlight-0fb3@gregkh>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 07:25:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 02:41:23AM +0900, Minu Jin wrote:
> > This series improves error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() and cleans up
> > the code style to comply with kernel standards.
> > 
> > In v6, I have reorganized the patches into a series of two to satisfy
> > both Greg and Dan's feedback:
> > 
> >     1. The first patch combines the logic change and caller updates.
> >        The function change and the caller updates must be in the same
> >        patch. If they are separated, the code will not work correctly 
> >        or will cause errors at that specific point in the history.
> > 
> >     2. The second patch focuses purely on code style cleanup (changing uint
> >        to unsigned int) as requested by Andy Shevchenko.
> > 
> > Regarding the logic change in _rtw_pktfile_read():
> > 
> >     The original code used a ternary operator to read whatever data was 
> >     available, even if it was less than requested. This could lead to 
> >     callers processing incomplete data without knowing it.
> > 
> >     I have changed this to return -EINVAL when the remaining data is insufficient. 
> >     This is safer because most callers expect the exact amount of data and 
> >     should not proceed with a partial read.
> > 
> > Changes in v6:
> >     - Reorganized into a 2-patch series to maintain git bisect safety.
> >     - Combined function logic changes with caller updates into Patch 1.
> >     - Separated style cleanup (uint -> unsigned int) into Patch 2.
> 
> Where is the list of changes for previous versions?
> 
> Also, was this tested on real hardware for this device?  As you are
> changing the main data path, that should be required here.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Regarding hardware testing:
I don't have access to hardware with this chipset. However,
I have
    - Reviewed all call sites carefully
    - Verified the code compiles without warnings
    - Ran smatch static analysis with no issues found

If anyone has the hardware and could test this series, I would
appreciate it.

Regarding the change log history:
Changes in v6:
    - Reorganized into a 2-patch series to maintain git bisect safety
      (addressed Dan Carpenter's feedback).
    - Combined function logic changes with caller updates into Patch 1.
    - Separated style cleanup (uint -> unsigned int) into Patch 2.

Changes in v5:
    - Split the patch into a 3-patch series (suggested by Greg KH).
    - Patch 1: Refactored return type to 'int'.
    - Patch 2: Added error checks to call sites.
    - Patch 3: Implemented -EINVAL logic.
    (Note: Superseded by v6 to fix git bisect issues).

Changes in v4:
    - Modified _rtw_pktfile_read() to return -EINVAL if data is
      insufficient (following Greg KH's hint).
    - Replaced 'uint' with 'unsigned int' (suggested by Andy Shevchenko).
    - Removed redundant local variable 'len'.

Changes in v3:
    - Updated set_qos() from void to int (suggested by Greg KH, Dan Carpenter).
    - Fixed coding style issues (suggested by Andy Shevchenko).

Changes in v2:
    - Added check for skb_copy_bits() return value.

Thanks,
Minu

      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-23  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-22 17:41 [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-01-22 17:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: update _rtw_pktfile_read() to return error codes Minu Jin
2026-01-27 14:35   ` Greg KH
2026-01-22 17:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: clean up _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-01-23  6:25 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Greg KH
2026-01-23  7:26   ` Minu Jin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXMiwivUd_j79kZS@JMW-Ubuntu \
    --to=s9430939@naver.com \
    --cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=karanja99erick@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=milospuric856@gmail.com \
    --cc=weibu@redadmin.org \
    --cc=zxcv2569763104@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox