From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: "Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Khushal Chitturi <khushalchitturi@gmail.com>,
Ethan Tidmore <ethantidmore06@gmail.com>,
Vivek BalachandharTN <vivek.balachandhar@gmail.com>,
Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>,
Artur Stupa <arthur.stupa@gmail.com>,
Zhuoheng Li <lizhuoheng@kylinos.cn>,
Nino Zhang <ninozhang001@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_joinbss_event_prehandle to reduce indentation
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:40:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab0WH6lA4GY6lp8J@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319231344.569418-3-azpijr@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 12:13:35AM +0100, Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga wrote:
> The rtw_joinbss_event_prehandle function has excessive indentation due
> to deeply nested if-statements.
>
> Refactor the function using early returns and guard clauses for the
> failure paths. This flattens the code and significantly improves
> readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga <azpijr@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 134 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index 805427353aa6..2a192c1dd038 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -1175,84 +1175,88 @@ void rtw_joinbss_event_prehandle(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *pbuf)
> pmlmepriv->link_detect_info.traffic_transition_count = 0;
> pmlmepriv->link_detect_info.low_power_transition_count = 0;
>
> - if (pnetwork->join_res > 0) {
> - spin_lock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> - retry = 0;
> - if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING)) {
> - /* s1. find ptarget_wlan */
> - if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED)) {
> - if (the_same_macaddr) {
> - ptarget_wlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, cur_network->network.mac_address);
> - } else {
> - pcur_wlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, cur_network->network.mac_address);
> - if (pcur_wlan)
> - pcur_wlan->fixed = false;
> -
> - pcur_sta = rtw_get_stainfo(pstapriv, cur_network->network.mac_address);
> - if (pcur_sta)
> - rtw_free_stainfo(adapter, pcur_sta);
> -
> - ptarget_wlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, pnetwork->network.mac_address);
> - if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)) {
> - if (ptarget_wlan)
> - ptarget_wlan->fixed = true;
> - }
> - }
> + if (pnetwork->join_res == -4) {
> + rtw_reset_securitypriv(adapter);
> + _set_timer(&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer, 1);
>
> - } else {
> - ptarget_wlan = _rtw_find_same_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, pnetwork);
> - if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)) {
> - if (ptarget_wlan)
> - ptarget_wlan->fixed = true;
> - }
> - }
> + if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING))
> + _clr_fwstate_(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING);
>
> - /* s2. update cur_network */
> - if (ptarget_wlan) {
> - rtw_joinbss_update_network(adapter, ptarget_wlan, pnetwork);
> - } else {
> - netdev_dbg(adapter->pnetdev,
> - "Can't find ptarget_wlan when joinbss_event callback\n");
> - spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> - goto ignore_joinbss_callback;
> - }
> + goto ignore_joinbss_callback;
> + }
>
> - /* s3. find ptarget_sta & update ptarget_sta after update cur_network only for station mode */
> - if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)) {
> - ptarget_sta = rtw_joinbss_update_stainfo(adapter, pnetwork);
> - if (!ptarget_sta) {
> - spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> - goto ignore_joinbss_callback;
> - }
> - }
> + if (pnetwork->join_res <= 0) {
This preserves how the existing code works, but originally there was
a comment here which said that join_res could only be < 0. Emotionally,
I would prefer if zero were treated as success. Can join_res actually
be zero?
Update: I looked and join_res can be zero. It comes from:
res = pmlmeinfo->aid = (int)(le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)(pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + 4))&0x3fff);
in the OnAssocRsp() function. I guess preserve the <= 0, but also
preserve the comment.
> + _set_timer(&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer, 1);
> + _clr_fwstate_(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING);
> + goto ignore_joinbss_callback;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> + retry = 0;
> +
> + if (!check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING)) {
> + spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> + goto ignore_joinbss_callback;
> + }
> +
> + /* s1. find ptarget_wlan */
> + if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED)) {
> + if (the_same_macaddr) {
> + ptarget_wlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, cur_network->network.mac_address);
> + } else {
> + pcur_wlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, cur_network->network.mac_address);
> + if (pcur_wlan)
> + pcur_wlan->fixed = false;
> +
> + pcur_sta = rtw_get_stainfo(pstapriv, cur_network->network.mac_address);
> + if (pcur_sta)
> + rtw_free_stainfo(adapter, pcur_sta);
>
> - /* s4. indicate connect */
> + ptarget_wlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, pnetwork->network.mac_address);
> if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)) {
> - pmlmepriv->cur_network_scanned = ptarget_wlan;
> - rtw_indicate_connect(adapter);
> + if (ptarget_wlan)
> + ptarget_wlan->fixed = true;
> }
> + }
> + } else {
> + ptarget_wlan = _rtw_find_same_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue, pnetwork);
> + if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)) {
> + if (ptarget_wlan)
> + ptarget_wlan->fixed = true;
> + }
> + }
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> + /* s2. update cur_network */
> + if (!ptarget_wlan) {
> + netdev_dbg(adapter->pnetdev, "Can't find ptarget_wlan when joinbss_event callback\n");
This line is too long. In the original code there was a newline after
the comma so it would have been 84 characters. Try to make as few
unrelated changes as possible.
> + spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> + goto ignore_joinbss_callback;
> + }
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->lock);
> - /* s5. Cancel assoc_timer */
> - timer_delete_sync(&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer);
> - spin_lock_bh(&pmlmepriv->lock);
> - } else {
> + rtw_joinbss_update_network(adapter, ptarget_wlan, pnetwork);
> +
> + /* s3. find ptarget_sta & update ptarget_sta after update cur_network only for station mode */
> + if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)) {
> + ptarget_sta = rtw_joinbss_update_stainfo(adapter, pnetwork);
> + if (!ptarget_sta) {
> spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> + goto ignore_joinbss_callback;
> }
> - } else if (pnetwork->join_res == -4) {
> - rtw_reset_securitypriv(adapter);
> - _set_timer(&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer, 1);
> -
> - if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING))
> - _clr_fwstate_(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING);
> + }
>
> - } else {/* if join_res < 0 (join fails), then try again */
> - _set_timer(&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer, 1);
> - _clr_fwstate_(pmlmepriv, _FW_UNDER_LINKING);
> + /* s4. indicate connect */
> + if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)) {
> + pmlmepriv->cur_network_scanned = ptarget_wlan;
> + rtw_indicate_connect(adapter);
> }
>
> + spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);
> +
> + /* s5. Cancel assoc_timer */
Put this comment after the spinlock (the way it was in the original
code).
> + spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->lock);
> + timer_delete_sync(&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer);
> + return;
Originally, we took a lock and then fell through to the unlock after
the ignore_joinbss_callback label. Which is obviously bogus so your
return is better. I also think it might be even better yet to get
rid of the ignore_joinbss_callback label entirely. A simple
spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->lock);
return;
Is only one more line of code, but it's much more readable.
regards,
dan carpenter
> +
> ignore_joinbss_callback:
>
> spin_unlock_bh(&pmlmepriv->lock);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 23:13 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: clean up rtw_joinbss_event_prehandle Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-03-19 23:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: remove dead REJOIN code Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-03-19 23:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_joinbss_event_prehandle to reduce indentation Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-03-20 8:05 ` Luka Gejak
2026-03-20 9:40 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab0WH6lA4GY6lp8J@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=arthur.stupa@gmail.com \
--cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
--cc=ethantidmore06@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=khushalchitturi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lizhuoheng@kylinos.cn \
--cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=ninozhang001@gmail.com \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=vivek.balachandhar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox