From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Lin YuChen <starpt.official@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, straube.linux@gmail.com,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt()
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 15:46:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abvwIQh0CHTp4wNJ@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319120737.29692-1-starpt.official@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 08:07:35PM +0800, Lin YuChen wrote:
> This series refactors rtw_aes_decrypt() to improve code readability by
> reducing nesting levels through the use of guard clauses.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Follow Dan Carpenter's suggestion to use direct returns (e.g., return
> _SUCCESS or _FAIL) instead of "goto exit" for the newly introduced
> guard clauses.
> - Revert unrelated line-breaking and formatting changes to ensure the
> patch remains focused strictly on the refactoring of indentation
> levels, as advised by Dan.
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
You don't have to do this if you don't want, but unrelated to your
patch but the last two bytes of &le_tmp64 in rtw_BIP_verify() should
be initialized. Just set it to zero at the start of the function.
Otherwise it's an uninitialized variable.
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:1308 rtw_BIP_verify() warn: not copying enough bytes for '&le_tmp64' (8 vs 6 bytes)
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 16:51 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() to reduce nesting Lin YuChen
2026-03-18 15:56 ` Greg KH
2026-03-18 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() Lin YuChen
2026-03-18 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for AES check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 7:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-03-19 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for AES check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for stainfo check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 12:46 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-03-19 17:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() YuChen Lin
2026-03-18 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for stainfo check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 7:58 ` [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() to reduce nesting Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abvwIQh0CHTp4wNJ@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=starpt.official@gmail.com \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox