From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 304671A9F88; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774657303; cv=none; b=gSFtlJTyVnOzsZ340uJtf5Ens3acLrfoWyzAC3wlJSrybksxsM3jhvDFl4KDqZbR2OpIQCCaLFskdG3IDKCd0nqDF1WHA2vS1Sai3wiqeOE1m0uBrYadyT3hmpkh1EssN3UR6i4YSBBjwMmVCJsR2wQB2TZuWhbTowBfo7rJiBg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774657303; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9UTNgnVyZK7CtGzOQ+KTtCnadAUg2Yr+hR6yAC9O7JA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u5WksjhTXC0zn2akrWO8++eOd1ccwGoue/oJYXHNTpDGP5xaYgI27d4Cf1i7oe5ZeOkYpv2NcXcuhz7tUoKat6XEzoN1SFKGuhaDyf7ILpUc9p0nQt1Ycs3AtHPy93/X/Mgcc45LVWlR5w7u9Ww6l/KIQstAg0AK5Jm/kHt7e0o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kUnHDJRo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kUnHDJRo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A53B9C2BC87; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:21:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774657303; bh=9UTNgnVyZK7CtGzOQ+KTtCnadAUg2Yr+hR6yAC9O7JA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kUnHDJRoIxTROjRvSUtoDnoXON2SjhQf7wmoFF1ztRbDiMiRbzRmKcEbiEgnJDdfS okmyTtsnNs1acfoi4Uc9Db2emHl8ajpdX61y1+lcBqqAO4RgP9x+14pMgCb2lpUuAi pZ5Ll+qdK8w+CQa1uDtig9WEKNdDSXhHzPFr+MR4IKXpfEY+rdOqIWoIj17TVq61xk 5icQ+7v1k04LPOIGZHEwA4aIo+AYNBrOzb1KGpqFrfUXkW9Rf1A8PyuYXU/ObuejdP LXN6fURy5XTUVBeCPU1YYtqH4MMTE+fnwMF1zATtRwcpS23EI1OibVH64SpaGwVHDC gpCqh/OeuAHsw== Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 01:21:40 +0100 From: Thierry Reding To: Greg KH Cc: Oskar Ray-Frayssinet , marvin24@gmx.de, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: nvec: fix block comment style in nvec.c Message-ID: References: <2026030929-uncheck-reclining-315b@gregkh> <20260309220718.6475-1-rayfraytech@gmail.com> <2026031833-pampers-steed-4804@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kc7lm5gu5ldem5af" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2026031833-pampers-steed-4804@gregkh> --kc7lm5gu5ldem5af Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: nvec: fix block comment style in nvec.c MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 03:59:43PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 11:07:18PM +0100, Oskar Ray-Frayssinet wrote: > > Fix block comment formatting to use * on subsequent lines > > and */ on a separate line as required by kernel coding style. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Oskar Ray-Frayssinet > > --- > > drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c > > index e70fafc095f2..0e655f79ea4a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c > > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *de= v) > > nvec_tx_set(nvec); > > to_send =3D nvec->tx->data[0]; > > nvec->tx->pos =3D 1; > > - /* Delay ACK due to AP20 HW Bug > > + /* delay ACK due to AP20 HW Bug > > * do not replace by usleep_range > > */ > > udelay(33); > > --=20 > > 2.43.0 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > This change is not what you documented is changing :( Hm... this is the 8th version of this patch that I've seen. I don't know why there was a flurry of these. The checkpatch warning certainly isn't new, so maybe this was a new wave of janitors or something? Or maybe people using AI agents to get into kernel development. Not that it matters much, but it's not a pattern that I've seen before. Also, the fact that 7 out of the 8 versions came in after the first had already landed in linux-next: 29e79c66b3cc ("staging: nvec: fix block comment style in nvec_interrupt()= ") suggests that people aren't using linux-next as their baseline. Do we need to be stricter in this regard? Seems a bit wasteful for you to have to spend so much time looking at duplicates, even though it seems like your automation did a lot of the work. Thierry --kc7lm5gu5ldem5af Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEiOrDCAFJzPfAjcif3SOs138+s6EFAmnHHxAACgkQ3SOs138+ s6E3KA/9F+uwKMnlyqJx+rSjJN3SkHYQoyqLntwktJN84VteZlbk3CNHLgi1/5Nh DMs0neW/qzNMmszn6ZavkwfCZ9hde9biVGaoIZfwcXQWD4zipnKC+vW5J3yKtuvb DsnOGfSxmRH+r7DF1AGJqBDqLqJnuvHmTjHvhscYGNSezjraYBKkK2QyO4l2zXLr CHtFQp2DRkTOo9FJDK9B9GPA88fzKc8r1MpAR4PdluDrSxpN5G+UzR8eEQWAVfW7 Rn093DrolDNshMwIxaERXD+tRwj7bi/hZkuv9DjUIrBF+7KaWsADvtAjbCL8QCfV c1VhM7S8FJGpE4zA3duU+ZSCw3b15upFFEUJUX+o80Sm/BK8Ux9sgJ0p6UhA/Xxq woNLDHWDl+Pf+b1wELSJ1BOs2NR9piKmaHdFi0+ZYZW7ddeBsQ7upwFK8hR5bnIm BJ7Wq4/EOEollzK7PljUmcRlMjSegl2PgEk2REU9QbZnTnPPqLy8DhkBbv7u74Wn cvLwxJH79BMHA0yHbBB4ZjzZQyc6YdnDmA3PvqCffPaiGoa6zNPXYZ9fnFMwy0cP NLQtj1zC3V1v3NwAw2o6HNOXaz1O9r/Ss3tN+yUPRu1XE4cgs5nvO+jvnALdFNXn 7NS7GdFzVH5mT+74Z80oN16LICOimPlv3si43hCFD0qWmfJjfpY= =q3Kd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kc7lm5gu5ldem5af--