public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Omer El Idrissi <omer.e.idrissi@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: replace function with error handling alternative
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 11:46:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aczbXwM38nUDTUpz@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331153255.22764-5-omer.e.idrissi@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Omer El Idrissi wrote:
> Replace the use of rtw_set_hal_ops with rtw_hal_data_init in
> rtw_sdio_if1_init , which actually returns error or success and not
> void.
> rtw_set_hal_ops literally only calls rtw_hal_data_init and just ignores the
> possibility of errors.
> 

This is a behavior change and it's quite dangerous.  A lot of code only
works because there is no error handling.  We can't merge it without
testing unless it causes a security issue or something.  For example,
not checking the results of allocations could cause a crash so maybe
that's a security bug.

> @@ -250,8 +244,9 @@ static struct adapter *rtw_sdio_if1_init(struct dvobj_priv *dvobj, const struct
>  	/* 3 3. init driver special setting, interface, OS and hardware relative */
>  
>  	/* 4 3.1 set hardware operation functions */
> -	rtw_set_hal_ops(padapter);
> -
> +	/* allocates padapter->HalData */
> +	if (rtw_hal_data_init(padapter))
> +		goto free_adapter;

I don't want to see checks in this style.  I always want them to be
in this format:

	ret = rtw_hal_data_init(padapter);
	if (ret)
		...

But in this case, just leave it because adding a new check would have
to be tested.

regards,
dan carpenter

>  
>  	/* 3 5. initialize Chip version */
>  	padapter->intf_start = &sd_intf_start;
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 15:32 [PATCH 0/5] rtw_sdio_if1_init cleanup and small logic tweak Omer El Idrissi
2026-03-31 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] staging: rtl8723bs: use direct returns in rtw_sdio_if1_init Omer El Idrissi
2026-03-31 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove useless line " Omer El Idrissi
2026-03-31 15:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove use of vendor-defined status macros Omer El Idrissi
2026-04-01  8:42   ` Dan Carpenter
2026-03-31 15:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: replace function with error handling alternative Omer El Idrissi
2026-04-01  8:46   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-03-31 15:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] staging: rtl8723bs: add separate label for freeing rtw_wdev Omer El Idrissi
2026-04-01  8:59   ` Dan Carpenter
2026-04-01  1:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] rtw_sdio_if1_init cleanup and small logic tweak Ethan Tidmore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aczbXwM38nUDTUpz@stanley.mountain \
    --to=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=omer.e.idrissi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox