From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: luka.gejak@linux.dev
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8723bs: fix remote heap info disclosure and OOB reads
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 16:50:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad-Xnciuuz6wqAVq@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415133726.23515-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 03:37:26PM +0200, luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote:
> From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>
> When building an association request frame, the driver iterates over
> the ies received from the ap. In three places, the driver trusts the
> attacker-controlled pIE->length without validating that it meets the
> minimum expected size for the respective ie.
>
> For WLAN_EID_HT_CAPABILITY, this causes an oob read of adjacent heap
> memory which is then transmitted over the air (remote heap information
> disclosure). For WLAN_EID_VENDOR_SPECIFIC, it causes two separate oob
> reads: one when checking the 4-byte oui, and another when copying the
> 14-byte wps ie.
>
> Fix these issues by adding explicit length checks and returning a
> failure if the length is insufficient. For HT_CAPABILITY, also clamp
> the length passed to rtw_set_ie() to the struct size.
>
> Fixes: 554c0a3abf21 ("staging: Add rtl8723bs sdio wifi driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Switched to fail-fast handling for malformed IEs in issue_assocreq().
> - Fixed HT capability path to use structure-sized output length in rtw_set_ie().
> - Updated commit message to reflect all oob read cases.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Refactored rtw_set_ie() alignment to follow "open parenthesis" style.
> - Allowed the line length to exceed 100 characters for better readability as requested by Greg KH.
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index 5f00fe282d1b..3d44bc36532d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -2929,6 +2929,9 @@ void issue_assocreq(struct adapter *padapter)
>
> switch (pIE->element_id) {
> case WLAN_EID_VENDOR_SPECIFIC:
> + if (pIE->length < 4)
> + goto exit;
Oh huh. I was more thinking about an upper bound, but yeah we need a
both. Anyway, what should the upper bound be?
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 13:37 [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8723bs: fix remote heap info disclosure and OOB reads luka.gejak
2026-04-15 13:50 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-04-15 16:28 ` Luka Gejak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad-Xnciuuz6wqAVq@stanley.mountain \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox