From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6374638236D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776152956; cv=none; b=jAupD+eBaEMDKEz/sLjE/+KN707tL+5d8jDxns/YzgrHfCcFZggraHGKJqy9J9sb4wOwVlUDHQ4XxRfRYE5yPEC0dKAHfKL8UENyW04+GTltmIaDN0Q8lDvjG96bKtyaOY6vSUX8C21KsUzC8ImV0vF6XcYjvFYhf33his86EHk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776152956; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MKuHVxrPF8dtGDV/naHv6QawM3n4QlmcIcVNt2I4WMM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ft140Nf5w235f64GjLwH9QXawbPjYjKfM0yNHHBBm6vEBYNCQ+mf5katt2H97T2XexN0UZ+Scx7OBaqErSqsSln+Pp57rm7J0EKjz6pethsW+Olzy4/dtW06CAnsuSzvxCdUr38i6Hcr54vpnIjpu+IjbscUTWEUllgT/p4l370= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Z/H05kPn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Z/H05kPn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1776152955; x=1807688955; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MKuHVxrPF8dtGDV/naHv6QawM3n4QlmcIcVNt2I4WMM=; b=Z/H05kPnYWSXp+r6DP4vng87UDmbvv8KWC1X4GeGEtKGTvze0keQ/5u0 1j/wXmRYEt/ns18+n5fU99FnpZBs/Npx2ISHdsxzK1dzHYXEtWN7wUZwh WngPe9+BCkwFdzi44Nam4boJj0bXHk4R9FE7TcQPn0ankHBFe0demqGTQ geCrYBfGqWTDywvIWnRi9Hc8XGtJzGuJf7GkxWwP/ggrn85AIGpbxwjSo rlfopgXTgmsq+I3FacWhI088keu1kOqv2/KMCAT/AD+XROOMXG0Azp9Hq thyTcriGjNJ9d7H37H0zHWHT5wE8kQ2KX0DrG1o47Vs82QNkXlaONsMKA w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: f4GocCY9T7uc6P63fo1JRQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: o5G4HOwVS1qOwjykTKSyTA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11758"; a="76979423" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="76979423" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Apr 2026 00:48:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tK5m3I0qSk2WsuZwT2/XcA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /+UWcmQDTdq+m+LAtapxnA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="229954370" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.106]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Apr 2026 00:48:23 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:48:20 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Joshua Crofts Cc: Dan Carpenter , lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] iio: frequency: ad9832: simplify bitwise math Message-ID: References: <20260411085848.75381-1-joshua.crofts1@gmail.com> <20260411085848.75381-3-joshua.crofts1@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 09:39:04AM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 at 09:27, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > Yes, please slow down as you also missed a tag. > > Yes, I've realized that it was stupid not to wait. What is the proper > etiquette here if the > v3 patch doesn't have the reviewed-by tag? Should I do a RESEND PATCH or a v4? > I've attached the tag in a reply to the v3 cover letter but not sure > if that will do something. In this case it was fine what you have done with attaching the missed tag, but be careful in the future. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko