From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Andrei Khomenkov <khomenkov@mailbox.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ethan Tidmore <ethantidmore06@gmail.com>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] staging: rtl8723bs: cleanup booleans and style
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 10:49:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adYImQMCJN9ImTKX@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260405160135.22291-1-khomenkov@mailbox.org>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 07:01:32PM +0300, Andrei Khomenkov wrote:
> This series of patches cleans up the rtl8723bs driver code to improve
> readability and alignment with the Linux kernel coding style. The
> changes affect if-statements and while-loops, including:
> - Simplifying boolean comparisons by removing redundant ' == true',
> ' != true', and ' == false'.
> - Adding spaces around bitwise operators.
> - Removing redundant parentheses.
> - Wrapping logical operators to the previous line.
>
> Changes are limited to 'if' and 'while' statements, where both logic
> and style are cleaned up at once. No functional changes are intended.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20260402150429.14761-1-khomenkov@mailbox.org
>
> v4:
> - Combined logic and style cleanups into single commits to
> avoid fragmented changes, as suggested by Dan Carpenter.
I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough... I meant if you change:
if ((foo == false) || (bar == true)) {
Then don't leave the extra parentheses:
Bad: if ((!foo) || (bar)) {
Good: if (!foo || bar) {
However, if you leave a comparison operation then *DO* leave the
parentheses. Also moving the && around or deleting white space
is unrelated. Don't do unrelated things.
However in the case of the parentheses it *IS* related because now
the parentheses look crazy. You *HAVE* to make that kind of change.
The one thing per patch rule cuts both ways, we don't want two things
per patch but we also don't want half a thing per patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-05 16:01 [PATCH v4 0/3] staging: rtl8723bs: cleanup booleans and style Andrei Khomenkov
2026-04-05 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: core: " Andrei Khomenkov
2026-04-06 20:51 ` Ethan Tidmore
2026-04-05 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] staging: rtl8723bs: hal: " Andrei Khomenkov
2026-04-05 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: " Andrei Khomenkov
2026-04-08 7:49 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adYImQMCJN9ImTKX@stanley.mountain \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=ethantidmore06@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khomenkov@mailbox.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox