From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
Cc: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org,
greghk@linuxfoundation.org, dlechner@baylibre.com,
nono.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: frequency: ad983x: replace do_div() with div64_ul().
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 07:30:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adh8zOCQDhGwgf0Y@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALoEA-yVCyyiA1gUCj4Z0JcLscpSSssPCPXnUPOciWJOHj3VUg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 09:58:20PM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 at 19:27, David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Except here you have clock frequencies.
> > Either they fit in 32bits or they don't.
> > So the value shouldn't be 'unsigned long', but either u32 or u64.
>
> The clk struct in linux/clk.h explicitly uses an unsigned long to represent
> the clock value, which is used in this driver. Using an unsigned long
> ensures platform independent usage without type mismatching.
...which effectively means the frequency most likely fits 32-bit. Otherwise
would it ever work on 32-bit platform? This is a mistake in CLK design.
> > You need to check the domain of the values, coccinelle is just looking
> > at the types.
> > Even with mclk being 'unsigned long' the code is fine provided the
> > frequency is below 4.2GHz.
>
> I agree that we're not dealing with potential truncation problems, however
> changing to div64_ul aligns the types with the clk API and scrubs a perfectly
> valid cocci error.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 13:18 [PATCH] iio: frequency: ad983x: replace do_div() with div64_ul() Joshua Crofts
2026-04-09 13:34 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-04-09 14:52 ` Greg KH
2026-04-09 15:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Joshua Crofts
2026-04-09 15:39 ` David Lechner
2026-04-09 15:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-09 15:49 ` [PATCH] " Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-09 17:27 ` David Laight
2026-04-09 19:58 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-04-09 21:46 ` David Laight
2026-04-10 4:30 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-04-10 6:58 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-04-10 8:11 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adh8zOCQDhGwgf0Y@ashevche-desk.local \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=greghk@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joshua.crofts1@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nono.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox