From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DEB39022B for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 07:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777273879; cv=none; b=RpoKG3Mry/vuIMgKTr6gpyvtvPBoXFVQHK8M/3mDTcj5fAQyPi/vKbRQ9Qj8RMzEdpfMReN1paa/n+0drxE3T1l61LdgySxyVQq3x7JIskJHrnpwmzF1afoVJP4swloxct+JvuxBedRa4CiMCovo7kwRa12Tf5MkhJc9raEOT50= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777273879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ySJzayWuu8pA8XhVo8gOfKNeveBOndo7TY8qlXdbrbM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=e1IiqpjDn/oGyzFADdtqwgZOEACuoTK6BFmQSB4Smz1EeOzJXmONMwWoaypPJJNk8JHe8TYkzdjPrAV51zYGYFgUyrF3QeIcvM8mbJunExKOwuYFAd+dQvSiRS2dT4/Sv/v42Jf1FDN9HC7Nbnk5G8p2Y/DrzWZbI4ueUgNBRiw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FPGBPeG6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FPGBPeG6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777273878; x=1808809878; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ySJzayWuu8pA8XhVo8gOfKNeveBOndo7TY8qlXdbrbM=; b=FPGBPeG6AP7hBN52VvYMjr0upL0uM6GMhG7lJicym7n9THA7610HWmz/ Dd1l7f/fCLY4fDkGNk7L0r1Qlh10PmOdYHPZGlD6WeLgs8NThrs33A1Vp 54d58qOgfViz4bd++zVrD5te2CBM+QWIMA1NsgOA+MTnFczYBYBSEoyEy k/6n9qM5yvO76raOvNbX2D4Uu94yXmQhpBmd2Im06dx8fMEoOoIdk4Atj 7YZTJhZmQ795zYHulVEzg65GtF95Aq9cWXCLgG+OsYLlgy32oBCgCU6ub pDUgos9xmnQseE67mhqUa7+DoR734+fy2JWTbF/EB2ANMyxL6ZrTkbgLG g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: T4WOkCmUSAGcGdut/T9o+w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: T4sOTmAyTbORidgR+JQpLQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11768"; a="77179549" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,201,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="77179549" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2026 00:11:17 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VC5Vo7cMTUu5TNoa+QWg0Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PvCHKEAbSi2YwLrS/Tu8MA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,201,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="230925811" Received: from fpallare-mobl4.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.2]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2026 00:11:15 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:11:12 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Tomasz Unger Cc: Hans de Goede , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sakari Ailus , Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: fix typo "commmit" in comments Message-ID: References: <20260425-atomisp-fix-typo-v1-1-7ded6cd4bc97.ref@yahoo.pl> <20260425-atomisp-fix-typo-v1-1-7ded6cd4bc97@yahoo.pl> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260425-atomisp-fix-typo-v1-1-7ded6cd4bc97@yahoo.pl> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sat, Apr 25, 2026 at 12:15:08PM +0200, Tomasz Unger wrote: > Fix a repeated typo "commmit" -> "commit" in generated code comments > across five files. Found with codespell. This code is very unlikely is going to be re-generated (as it's coupled with all problems, including legal ones, to the associated firmware). That said, just drop that comment altogether instead of fixing typos in it. (Also drop the same where no typos were detected.) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko