From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Nikolay Kulikov <nikolayof23@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrei Khomenkov <khomenkov@mailbox.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove commented out code in rtw_mlme_ext.c
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 12:03:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agGbearJiYajq7rv@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agFV6Bpe_HyxC4qG@archlinux>
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 07:07:04AM +0300, Nikolay Kulikov wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 04:43:14PM +0300, Andrei Khomenkov wrote:
> > Remove commented out code in the site_survey function as it is not used.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
> It is better to indicate function names with brackets: site_survey().
>
I feel like we can go mad with these sorts of review comments. I spent
five minute reviewing all these patches and now I have to review them
all again because of this really minor thing?
My trick for minor review comments, is that I try to find a real bug
and I tie the minor thing to a major comment. "Sorry, you forgot to
add clean up on error and also you forgot a comma in your commit
message".
There a lot of minor stuff that I end up ignoring...
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-10 13:43 [PATCH 0/9] remove unused code and simplify if-else blocks Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused DBG_FIXED_CHAN code Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused DBG_RX_DUMP_EAP code Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused CONSISTENT_PN_ORDER code Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused DBG_CH_SWITCH code Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 5/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused REMOVE_PACK code Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 6/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused RTW_DVOBJ_CHIP_HW_TYPE code Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 7/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused RTW_MLME_EXT_C_ code Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 8/9] staging: rtl8723bs: remove commented out code in rtw_mlme_ext.c Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-11 4:07 ` Nikolay Kulikov
2026-05-11 9:03 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-05-11 12:59 ` Nikolay Kulikov
2026-05-10 13:43 ` [PATCH 9/9] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify if-else blocks " Andrei Khomenkov
2026-05-11 4:13 ` Nikolay Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agGbearJiYajq7rv@stanley.mountain \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khomenkov@mailbox.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nikolayof23@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox