From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD55F426D13 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 15:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782746131; cv=none; b=kHbo4Cm2P4HV6O/Hi8qyfkMJefNWesa7ppxMxMXnFVkHkOOO9inlsiroiauuuGLevqQEPJmR1rGNZMHRoz5m/BfBcPv2lqektsF0/Rbw4bC8smhHN8+vy/LhD24h6wRUs1VgdYokqD5Zc3kc5oA8Av8VPdTaf5Z4rSzJE+RU7Xk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782746131; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wdzGryGJXKi/hHuPN7L/AmS0QCPPOlS6W1rJcjiYE1s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h2/nD3FUGN9U1UNMXdyQDGFiHxxuAD9t4cXXsfnam13JZhVMesBvtfO8NexpQiQ394Fz6KIgQVtFHM7OMy1lC3rNV/UHsnjvPxaWZlPu8+X8M5tzeipyYJ3SNwLjhRPFHaBneeVxTDuPGGXfcEy449YVgLhXETmEav+gLD9g+n8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hNdmlNR8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hNdmlNR8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782746130; x=1814282130; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wdzGryGJXKi/hHuPN7L/AmS0QCPPOlS6W1rJcjiYE1s=; b=hNdmlNR8c7b9Kv9TXarLmFD/hmZRR7sjwLVDUiA+s3DaFfXHBVx81oCg w+yxRZpv0sQy3RxRAGO+rcc3WqcpoXhDD9IRodx01N7xk3uCT24JnSAk3 222NHcLDx7ECBBTl3CwMIxkRcPzybOCJbhdIXuyrvy0eK0yxfflXNi88Q kBGXZB3vYp/xD6k7LV3vNSs4/au+0zS8OzHHH4+pOn+s6/BMBtMHZ5cD7 2cSWx23xjvdCOp809cUB2lgeMMIip8L2RzLOrBk8nuJz+rWw85SJKmseq cO9L2uWf3q8G1qig7WI+I4bX3FKtHrXL0H8pFWT65DOs6U2lkBXEsLH+9 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kaHz3Vx2ReuoHqxVf/9yfA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: JIe0v5ZnR7C6r+P10tciBA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11832"; a="94591444" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,232,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="94591444" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2026 08:14:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CaeBuvTsRguVFv1TMfb2nQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: R72cGVW/T7KMySNl1UQU8Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,232,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="282055689" Received: from kniemiec-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.207]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2026 08:14:24 -0700 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:14:22 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ricardo Ribalda Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Hans de Goede , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: atomisp: Demote all kernel-doc comments Message-ID: References: <20260629-atomisp-kerneldoc-simple-v1-0-8ae282b85c5c@chromium.org> <20260629-atomisp-kerneldoc-simple-v1-2-8ae282b85c5c@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260629-atomisp-kerneldoc-simple-v1-2-8ae282b85c5c@chromium.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 11:48:29AM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > Despite the fact that kernel-doc does not emit warning for these > comments, it is much more consistent if we keep the marker /** > exclusively for kernel-doc. I see valid kernel doc in many places, please reconsider touching only controversial cases. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko