From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9B37B; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:56:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=uFD3cgMWkcIJ2NqVC1pnXMQq6rewZDYCcFM5WgVsshE=; b=Dr7UHQjtiFWWiss9BeBq04BcEoxxACp5atGLpCd5in7SBLaKAGu9h4ks dLOsWnnrPEpwNhSBxJKVfH+8fVfMzYRj8P3zthhFUbtoEfMjZJdyMGSxJ xf67IhyAfu/VWCUOOaeedW5rVKqCfFnXal/KC/P/eLOqpEqtpFci2kYbm 8=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=julia.lawall@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,252,1673910000"; d="scan'208";a="96627995" Received: from 231.85.89.92.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([92.89.85.231]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2023 09:56:07 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:56:06 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Khadija Kamran cc: Julia Lawall , outreachy@lists.linux.dev, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: axis-fifo: alignment should match opening parenthesis in axis-fifo.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Khadija Kamran wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:13:49AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > There are actually two similar issues in axis-fifo.c. You could fix them > > both at once. > > Hey Julia! > I have a question. Should I send the two fixes as a patchset of two > patches, and should I send it as [PATCH v2]? > Thank you. The two issues in axis-fifo.c are very similar. They could be in a single patch. And that patch could be the v2 of your previous patch. Just note that you have fixed another instance of the same problem in the message under the ---. julia