From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Maritu Hone <marehone12@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: uart: fix heap buffer overflow in gb_tty->buffer
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:04:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aumjuGK9yakMjsDd@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102195332.19860-1-marehone12@gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 10:53:32PM +0300, Maritu Hone wrote:
> gb_tty->buffer is allocated once in gb_uart_probe() and reused for
> every outgoing chunk as the backing store for a
> struct gb_uart_send_data_request:
>
> struct gb_uart_send_data_request {
> __le16 size;
> __u8 data[];
> } __packed;
>
> In gb_uart_tx_write_work():
>
> request = gb_tty->buffer;
> ...
> send_size = gb_tty->buffer_payload_max;
> if (send_size > gb_tty->credits)
> send_size = gb_tty->credits;
> send_size = kfifo_out_peek(&gb_tty->write_fifo,
> &request->data[0], send_size);
>
> request->data starts 2 bytes (sizeof(request->size)) into
> gb_tty->buffer, and up to buffer_payload_max bytes are written there
> whenever enough data is queued and credits allow it. That needs
> buffer_payload_max + sizeof(struct gb_uart_send_data_request) bytes
> of backing storage, i.e. max_payload bytes.
>
> gb_tty->buffer is allocated with only buffer_payload_max bytes:
>
> gb_tty->buffer_payload_max = max_payload -
> sizeof(struct gb_uart_send_data_request);
> gb_tty->buffer = kzalloc(gb_tty->buffer_payload_max, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> so a full-size write overruns the allocation by exactly
> sizeof(struct gb_uart_send_data_request) (2) bytes, corrupting
> whatever follows it on the heap.
>
> Allocate max_payload bytes instead, which is exactly
> sizeof(struct gb_uart_send_data_request) + buffer_payload_max, so the
> buffer is large enough for the header and the full data payload it is
> used to hold.
I think the above is clear enough.
> Fixes: dd1c64ede97f ("greybus: uart: kmalloc for send_data once only")
This should also go to stable:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Maritu Hone <marehone12@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
> index e1b73db6a17c..7bbac2603726 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
> @@ -842,7 +842,15 @@ static int gb_uart_probe(struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev,
> gb_tty->buffer_payload_max = max_payload -
> sizeof(struct gb_uart_send_data_request);
>
> - gb_tty->buffer = kzalloc(gb_tty->buffer_payload_max, GFP_KERNEL);
> + /*
> + * gb_tty->buffer is reused in gb_uart_tx_write_work() as the
> + * backing store for a struct gb_uart_send_data_request, whose
> + * variable-length data[] field holds up to buffer_payload_max
> + * bytes starting right after the struct's header. The allocation
> + * therefore needs room for the header plus buffer_payload_max
> + * bytes of data, i.e. max_payload bytes, not buffer_payload_max.
> + */
LLMs like to add comments like this, but please remove it in a v2.
> + gb_tty->buffer = kzalloc(max_payload, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!gb_tty->buffer) {
> retval = -ENOMEM;
> goto exit_put_port;
Johan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 19:53 [PATCH] staging: greybus: uart: fix heap buffer overflow in gb_tty->buffer Maritu Hone
2026-11-02 21:33 ` Alex Elder
2026-11-03 8:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-11-03 9:12 ` Johan Hovold
2026-11-03 9:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-11-03 9:49 ` Johan Hovold
2026-11-03 9:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-11-03 9:04 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aumjuGK9yakMjsDd@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=marehone12@gmail.com \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox