From: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev,
johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: add blank line after struct
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:52:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c82427af-dc37-734b-348c-371103a4ff90@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2303191246190.2867@hadrien>
On ١٩/٣/٢٠٢٣ ١٣:٤٦, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>
>> On ١٩/٣/٢٠٢٣ ١٣:٣٦, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>>>
>>>> On ١٩/٣/٢٠٢٣ ١٣:١٩, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> add blank line after struct for readability as
>>>>> The log message should start with a capital letter, so "Add".
>>>> Okay, I will fix it.
>>>>
>>>>>> reported by checkpatch script
>>>>> "reported by checkpatch" or "reported by the checkpatch script".
>>>>> The first is more concise, and it doesn't really matter whether
>>>>> checkpatch
>>>>> is a script or something else.
>>>> got it.
>>>>
>>>>>> " CHECK: Please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum
>>>>>> declarations"
>>>>> I guess the #define was concatenated to the end of the definition to
>>>>> show
>>>>> that it is closely related to the definition. With the #define, it
>>>>> seems
>>>>> rather natural, but the better soltution would be to make a static
>>>>> inline
>>>>> function in both cases. There would naturally be a blank line before a
>>>>> function definition as well.
>>>> got your point, so, should i ignore this?
>>> Not sure what you mean by ignore. If you rewrite the #define as a
>>> function, an use the natural placement for a function definition, then the
>>> checkpatch warning will go away as a side effect.
>>
>> I mean ignore this patch and make another patch with rewrite #define as you
>> suggested.
> Yes :) That's fine ("drop" would be better than "ignore").
>
> julia
>
Okay :D, Thanks Julia.
Menna
>>
>> Menna
>>
>>> julia
>>>
>>>> Menna
>>>>
>>>>> julia
>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h | 2 ++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h
>>>>>> b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h
>>>>>> index d4a225b76338..1de510499480 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h
>>>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct gbphy_device {
>>>>>> struct list_head list;
>>>>>> struct device dev;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> #define to_gbphy_dev(d) container_of(d, struct gbphy_device, dev)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static inline void *gb_gbphy_get_data(struct gbphy_device *gdev)
>>>>>> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct gbphy_driver {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct device_driver driver;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> #define to_gbphy_driver(d) container_of(d, struct gbphy_driver,
>>>>>> driver)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int gb_gbphy_register_driver(struct gbphy_driver *driver,
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-19 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-19 11:08 [PATCH] staging: greybus: add blank line after struct Menna Mahmoud
2023-03-19 11:19 ` Julia Lawall
2023-03-19 11:28 ` Menna Mahmoud
2023-03-19 11:36 ` Julia Lawall
2023-03-19 11:41 ` Menna Mahmoud
2023-03-19 11:46 ` Julia Lawall
2023-03-19 11:52 ` Menna Mahmoud [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-19 11:41 Menna Mahmoud
2023-03-19 13:20 ` Menna Mahmoud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c82427af-dc37-734b-348c-371103a4ff90@gmail.com \
--to=eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox