From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD79723CD for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 06:22:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1688970110; x=1689574910; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=42kO++UW1qAfJ9DX+6wgsp1asYnY3UofIPxyTDLeN3g=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=eXIDxS04tWgyg4HPQVVNoDA/W53FZxVrRrm+cs2Dz28/VmTg72x8uE5c0OYNjp6SCYsoYlT iS9q9mhqqDb5y8b+QSMsmUGu3Nxr9edzmON25qFojMn7LF/kGE59NG9AqZj+YLOJHKPYUcf7H OvMIP9vnt7hcMSRhMqsAAXqrcmO3AFSusrAvJF+kYdYxDD11WLBeTI4KRoPPChVDOykQSFqxW iV4h0AbVQKjIP3P1vwUG0QvnF4NF68rdbBnyv4S4DF8EDaxk7VzsUAj7EAOFXhWORInqlfkWq deqnxKHsG1XJgyht/vwSvEmwX5OF9RbfPR8ozE55FsrCpp/zOpww== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.90.83]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb106 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtyA2-1pzzVK30rE-00uCjI; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 08:21:50 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 08:21:40 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: staging: ks7010: potential buffer overflow in ks_wlan_set_encode_ext() To: Zhang Shurong , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Dan Carpenter , Xu Panda References: <2a41ca22-a0eb-df38-be43-7175e1230bd0@web.de> <2023070919-monetary-sleet-2f5c@gregkh> Content-Language: en-GB From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:pOeD+L3/BnthGHA9Vld9+QP7fJGlaEpvV/QVAxypiD1/FPb3IsB XPHddMza6tVsu0u2MAiSCnHQIKJq0kBVH1x08no7qUF/5/+VCvl7BFmRT/iQA68KvVe/3q+ yljHue2qKpd7jnaaeHCM+LB41NjwTNf2s9ddHx0T7BjW/r0HMMFRpKUJbVnQc6w2VOuwPlD cjJY6XWraj7xZVR3wrzmQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:ELTMD5khHWc=;Q9XsD9yjgt1lDogx03o9jAZBcWM 9ldTFzddsFj+YmaMu0JWE0xK1tcwhsDOij+Y+GrGuN0xCNL17V3BB4oYLc5IigR4cSEF4RKPz 7tjmhCLv+ZTOXrVGLmNrAye9zGv/vZwqeuW0sX7leSm3NKjvJ9oA8+D2meG56+RBjZ+uy+Y6G eHlBF25n+EEo5FfCarUaxkz/MDGyXqJwDCjR4q8yzRy9rvCwNGpgFBHLbtP+wzHgylJuA6KnS Zfb+pfivfEnOU4sxw00ubBfA1Hxre2vGd8vSAyMN+jZH4tBJ55d7wkVS1rafJq9NkB48hQ36W b0Rd0pv0ypMQfxzAujL13Ai4gKJhgDBzj6rTzvXKP1lX+WJ5TIdFyniG67CBlBhRWx4IqxE1T a00Z0T0wfwxGGHDAE4NO44zn02+0VTBBSgRn1nyIGgalP2YYHJzXIw5NllwQdLuP8FfCMehbg cFZhm3DoGddW0yZyt82eshGFugwEh+0i8XOIjYcSoh6VceNr7tFIhL1eL/VPOUzJFPzW5/8aL YY/PRxAUxUwV3TY3ptAqlwr/Wff2By/cTalikYMdm5B99rSPc2t0w60J0cPIQd9cAg/dWVXxU GLw8rTwsF2eUK41lwKGwSnsNzl5UlVOvY+7RXm4uDKeHDOuXru9QMGL6xQynvuBJKhoQrZqHV qGrhabeDtnnOKKlPpVfSag69GXPVtFd9Qp3uJDWDDHWcISeYd0H9wzvL4pwbqWUaC+nR4K5vu uF4LA/llcKNMEh8wDhKlaNGqM91ZUnAnseuKmWsCv68JFTDdgJzM6LJ90S7mzgI9dHvtFISE2 a2BGLvh2Lj3izFfHcqAfXyUWW7EX7ZjMJaTYJmpoKkYU8N/QecnbdfC+kMyr7ZXHzuOW5dRQe YOx1aDOB2VAQ5JnPCzE5XgdrCfY2GMX0HkTGzSSQIw+SkF9+ZrX/pwCfIbU5+HgubYl6fzpwP 3kAH/A== =E2=80=A6 >> It seems that further contributors need to become more aware about >> (and finally adhere to) requirements from the Linux development documen= tation. =E2=80=A6 > I'm guilty of my incorrect patch format. And do I need to write another > patch to fix this format issue? This can be an usual consequence for the current change review if you would really like to take provided information and advices better into account. Some communication parameters influence if further development ideas will actually be picked up for desirable improvements (also for your change suggestions). Regards, Markus