From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CEF7181 for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 08:43:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1653986598; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9fPaBZDsV84kO0IEmLkMM+G7p0afLOtSjYZX9TssTp0=; b=KD2GEueMmD56jLsUlq+hXVpsGyTJKUavvPSr58Ip2Gn+frPlVKJ80idEnwFyF0umFIbjGF IxA38dqYg7KB24eEtgHcmyOM0sUYt8DJoQTi9ME6AsHvB6W7hxJhad/cblWdEcB6azJFDe GX9BraDjSAk2QBrYKQ+czESoXVcVggM= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-385-zYKFf2XDOEWXJUcPV_XEjg-1; Tue, 31 May 2022 04:43:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zYKFf2XDOEWXJUcPV_XEjg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id j40-20020a05600c1c2800b003972dbb1066so1078585wms.4 for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 01:43:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9fPaBZDsV84kO0IEmLkMM+G7p0afLOtSjYZX9TssTp0=; b=TwS2bUpIdLeHHU13W7BP3rdKDt3SrZEbXcf4PynwekvtNISsAX+HeNkkXIlmK/71QQ isxglI/lYNgxoBZ17oi5n4LRaYysNS0zxsBD47Fq9YE9GMeAz0XH+bXui5xsnJj3Jj9D N17xSSmAq+RebbXv5PU4VTPrY3J9BrAhxsn6HqLLZigVBDsPEOoF/zFnNpckbyqu2PaF 4EJXG3FTBIrTSrE5SAC/uIlksTQkWLRojDj1eU7ljZ4lpy67VpBUzIaQJmHhF7mYF6wU PFEQw3LLaIbp5VyUDyD1LJ5PNiWRCVVPlkp+kYuYgA5dOfMdKa/ruPVPJxYS1J0NW2cL LJ/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kbcoOtiqv0BJG7+SfpEFdAIgeAcWbcxUl/alyWjEGhzDNeFnL JUkesif8QZP2LjyU2qSKesd7ZA4mPHgQkBVW/hA+Ia3lDKLe92Fsavd40P8ofY+W8J1xhHwha20 D2kib1fKEvwOufbbxxGsNjDuWSg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b05:b0:397:54ce:896 with SMTP id m5-20020a05600c3b0500b0039754ce0896mr22494784wms.3.1653986591070; Tue, 31 May 2022 01:43:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfshR+I/hDPQmtoECOmlS+FrzrfxKwqTinLxQRa/ZAYNB2+FaUFLoMjB75XtGMJIFbhKjijA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b05:b0:397:54ce:896 with SMTP id m5-20020a05600c3b0500b0039754ce0896mr22494767wms.3.1653986590859; Tue, 31 May 2022 01:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gerbillo.redhat.com (146-241-112-184.dyn.eolo.it. [146.241.112.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g9-20020a05600c4ec900b0039c17452732sm1554367wmq.19.2022.05.31.01.43.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 May 2022 01:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] netlink: fix missing destruction of rhash table in error case From: Paolo Abeni To: Chengguang Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 10:43:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220529153456.4183738-2-cgxu519@mykernel.net> References: <20220529153456.4183738-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net> <20220529153456.4183738-2-cgxu519@mykernel.net> User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 (3.42.4-2.fc35) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pabeni@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, On Sun, 2022-05-29 at 23:34 +0800, Chengguang Xu wrote: > Fix missing destruction(when '(--i) == 0') for error case in > netlink_proto_init(). > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu > --- > net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c > index 0cd91f813a3b..bd0b090a378b 100644 > --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c > +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c > @@ -2887,7 +2887,7 @@ static int __init netlink_proto_init(void) > for (i = 0; i < MAX_LINKS; i++) { > if (rhashtable_init(&nl_table[i].hash, > &netlink_rhashtable_params) < 0) { > - while (--i > 0) > + while (--i >= 0) > rhashtable_destroy(&nl_table[i].hash); > kfree(nl_table); > goto panic; The patch looks correct to me, but it looks like each patch in this series is targeting a different tree. I suggest to re-send, splitting the series into individual patches, and sending each of them to the appropriate tree. You can retain Dan's Review tag. Thanks, Paolo