From: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
To: julia.lawall@inria.fr, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
david.laight.linux@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org,
andy@kernel.org,
Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Use % 4096 instead of & 0xfff
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:47:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8d515539ba560961003eae15d301d03e6cdd17d.1744966511.git.abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1744966511.git.abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
The sequence number is constrained to a range of [0, 4095], which
is a total of 4096 values. The bitmask operation using `& 0xfff` is
used to perform this wrap-around. While this is functionally correct,
it obscures the intended semantic of a 4096-based wrap.
Using a modulo operation `% 4096u` makes the wrap-around logic
explicit and easier to understand. It clearly signals that the
sequence number cycles through a range of 4096 values.
It also makes the code robust against potential changes of the 4096
upper limit, especially when it becomes a non power-of-2 value while
the AND(&) works solely for power-of-2 values.
The use of `% 4096u` also guarantees that the modulo operation is
performed with unsigned arithmetic, preventing potential issues with
the signed types.
Found by Coccinelle.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 6 +++---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index 952ce6dd5af9..f712ea0cabee 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -3511,7 +3511,7 @@ void issue_action_BA(struct adapter *padapter, unsigned char *raddr, unsigned ch
/* if ((psta = rtw_get_stainfo(pstapriv, pmlmeinfo->network.mac_address)) != NULL) */
psta = rtw_get_stainfo(pstapriv, raddr);
if (psta) {
- start_seq = (psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[status & 0x07]&0xfff) + 1;
+ start_seq = (psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[status & 0x07] % 4096u) + 1;
psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[status & 0x07] = start_seq;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
index a389ba5ecc6f..25411cc5c738 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static int check_indicate_seq(struct recv_reorder_ctrl *preorder_ctrl, u16 seq_n
struct dvobj_priv *psdpriv = padapter->dvobj;
struct debug_priv *pdbgpriv = &psdpriv->drv_dbg;
u8 wsize = preorder_ctrl->wsize_b;
- u16 wend = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + wsize - 1) & 0xFFF;/* 4096; */
+ u16 wend = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + wsize - 1) % 4096u;
/* Rx Reorder initialize condition. */
if (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq == 0xFFFF)
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static int check_indicate_seq(struct recv_reorder_ctrl *preorder_ctrl, u16 seq_n
/* 2. Incoming SeqNum is larger than the WinEnd => Window shift N */
/* */
if (SN_EQUAL(seq_num, preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq)) {
- preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) & 0xFFF;
+ preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) % 4096u;
} else if (SN_LESS(wend, seq_num)) {
/* boundary situation, when seq_num cross 0xFFF */
@@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static int recv_indicatepkts_in_order(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_reor
list_del_init(&(prframe->u.hdr.list));
if (SN_EQUAL(preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq, pattrib->seq_num))
- preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) & 0xFFF;
+ preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) % 4096u;
/* Set this as a lock to make sure that only one thread is indicating packet. */
/* pTS->RxIndicateState = RXTS_INDICATE_PROCESSING; */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
index 5def2467f42b..76f25ab6a779 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ s32 rtw_make_wlanhdr(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *hdr, struct pkt_attrib *pattr
if (psta) {
psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
- psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
+ psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] %= 4096u;
pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
@@ -964,12 +964,12 @@ s32 rtw_make_wlanhdr(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *hdr, struct pkt_attrib *pattr
pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
} else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] =
- (tx_seq + 1) & 0xfff;
+ (tx_seq + 1) % 4096u;
pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
} else {
psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] =
- (pattrib->seqnum + 1) & 0xfff;
+ (pattrib->seqnum + 1) % 4096u;
pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
}
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-18 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 9:47 [PATCH v11 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Improve readability and clarity of sequence number wrapping Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2025-04-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v11 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Add spaces and line breaks to improve readability Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2025-04-18 9:47 ` Abraham Samuel Adekunle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8d515539ba560961003eae15d301d03e6cdd17d.1744966511.git.abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--to=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox